Wednesday, December 4, 2024

Reclaiming America's Strength: Reversing Politicization and Leftist Agendas in the Intelligence Community

By Bobby Darvish, Iranian-American Ex-Muslim, Former Vegan, Former Democrat, Former Socialist, Former CAIR-Columbus Executive Director, Former Muslim Forum of Utah President, Former Pagan, Christian Conservative LDS Priest

As an Iranian-American with a deep understanding of geopolitical threats and a Christian Conservative deeply invested in America's future, I am alarmed by the leftist transformation of our intelligence agencies under the Biden administration. This politicization not only undermines national security but also dilutes the core mission of safeguarding our nation's sovereignty.

Under President Biden, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) shifted its focus to agendas such as diversity initiatives and climate change. Recruitment advertisements emphasized identity politics rather than operational excellence, portraying the CIA as a progressive social experiment instead of a formidable defender of American interests (The Hill, 2021). While diversity and climate awareness have their places in society, prioritizing these issues within an intelligence framework erodes the agency's credibility and efficiency.

In the face of rising threats from adversaries like China, Russia, and Iran, such distractions are unacceptable. These nations are not merely competitors but existential threats. They undermine U.S. sovereignty through cyberattacks, intellectual property theft, and economic subversion. The Biden administration's globalist posture has emboldened these adversaries, allowing their influence to seep into policymaking and erode the foundational values of American strength.

A Trump-Led CIA: Restoring Focus on National Security

Donald Trump's potential return to leadership offers hope for recalibrating the CIA's mission. A Trump-led intelligence community will reject performative politics and globalist distractions in favor of focusing on real-world threats. Trump's administration demonstrated an unyielding commitment to exposing adversarial networks, addressing cyber threats, and countering economic espionage.

China, for instance, has weaponized cyber technology to infiltrate American infrastructure, intellectual property, and sensitive defense operations. A reformed CIA must prioritize dismantling these networks and holding bad actors accountable. Russia’s aggressive tactics in Eastern Europe and its influence operations in the West demand a robust intelligence response, not a diluted focus on non-security-related issues. Meanwhile, Iran's proxy terrorism and pursuit of nuclear capabilities represent direct challenges that require undivided attention.

The Stakes for Sovereignty

America’s sovereignty is under siege—not only from foreign adversaries but also from internal forces pushing divisive agendas. Under Biden, intelligence agencies have become instruments for advancing progressive ideals rather than tools to protect the republic. This trend mirrors my personal experience with leftist movements, where ideological purity often trumped pragmatism. It was this realization that drove my transformation from a socialist to a conservative Christian committed to truth and accountability.

Trump's leadership offers a clear alternative: an unapologetic commitment to America First principles, where national security is paramount, and intelligence agencies are empowered to confront existential threats without the shackles of ideological agendas.

Conclusion

The intelligence community must return to its original purpose—defending American sovereignty against all threats, foreign and domestic. Politicization under the Biden administration has weakened our nation’s defenses and emboldened adversaries. A Trump presidency would restore focus, discipline, and effectiveness to the CIA, ensuring that America remains the land of the free and the home of the brave.

Citations

  1. The Hill. (2021). CIA faces backlash over “woke” recruitment ad. Retrieved from https://thehill.com
  2. Office of the Director of National Intelligence. (2023). Annual Threat Assessment. Retrieved from https://dni.gov
  3. United States Cyber Command. (2022). Report on Adversarial Cyber Threats. Retrieved from https://cybercom.mil
  4. Hudson Institute. (2023). Economic Espionage: Countering China and Russia. Retrieved from https://hudson.org

No comments: