Saturday, November 9, 2024

The Tragic Woke Transformation of 'Wicked': A Disgusting Display of Cultural Marxism and DEI Indoctrination

The Tragic Woke Transformation of 'Wicked': A Disgusting Display of Cultural Marxism and DEI Indoctrination

By Bobby Darvish - darvishintelligence.blogspot.com


As an Iranian-American ex-Muslim who found the light of Christianity and now holds my faith dear as a conservative member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, I have to speak out against the latest Hollywood “masterpiece” of indoctrination: Wicked. What was once a captivating prequel with some moral complexity has become a nauseating spectacle, dripping with DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) dogma, cultural Marxist distortions, and fourth-wave feminist ideology. This is not entertainment; it’s indoctrination—and it comes at the expense of values that I, and many other Americans, hold sacred.

When I first encountered previews for the new Wicked movie, my disappointment was immediate. Instead of the once-interesting tale of the "wicked" witch's origins, Hollywood has decided to twist the narrative into yet another reversal of traditional values. This version of Wicked turns the Witch of the West into the "good gal," portraying her as misunderstood, relatable, and morally "right" in her villainy. Meanwhile, the Wizard, previously seen as the somewhat flawed but still wise figure in Oz, is now framed as the antagonist, a symbol of oppression and villainy. This inversion of values is disturbing, and it’s emblematic of a broader trend in Hollywood that’s been pushing the envelope of “anti-hero” stories into dangerous ideological territory.

In Wicked, Glinda, the Good Witch, is now friends with the Wicked Witch. Why? Because nothing in Hollywood is off-limits to the agenda of "redefining" morality, especially if it means tearing down traditional depictions of good and evil. The narrative seems more about dismantling ideas of objective morality than about telling a compelling story. It’s no accident that these messages are being spoon-fed to young viewers under the guise of entertainment. Movies like Wicked are not just isolated stories; they’re part of a larger strategy to "reimagine" the way young minds understand right and wrong, morality and immorality, heroes and villains.

This modern take on Wicked falls neatly into the framework of cultural Marxism, a movement that aims to undermine established cultural and moral values by inverting and ridiculing them. Much like the ideology's forebearers in Marxist philosophy, the goal here is to destroy the existing value system so something “new and better” can take its place. In this case, Hollywood's "better" involves subverting traditional narratives, tearing down moral distinctions, and blurring the line between heroism and villainy. Instead of understanding the struggle between good and evil as something real and profound, movies like Wicked would rather paint these concepts as relative and interchangeable.

Now let’s talk about DEI and the woke ideology permeating this remake. Diversity, equity, and inclusion are noble ideas when used appropriately, but Hollywood's obsession with these buzzwords has led to absurd and morally bankrupt interpretations in films like Wicked. It’s no longer about telling stories that celebrate genuine diversity or include characters of diverse backgrounds. Instead, DEI has become a dogmatic approach to tearing down anything that resembles the traditional, painting it as oppressive and outdated. Under DEI’s influence, we see virtue-signaling replacing meaningful storytelling, ideological purity taking precedence over character development, and a push to show “goodness” as simply a matter of moral relativism. The DEI cult would have us believe that the Wicked Witch is now good because, somehow, everything we thought we knew was wrong. This mindset is not only exhausting but offensive to anyone with a commitment to truth and morality.

In my home, I’ll never allow Wicked or anything like it. Hollywood’s endless rehashing of old stories with a fresh coat of woke, DEI, or feminist paint has lost all appeal. And for me, it’s not just about the ideological bent of the movie; it’s about where we choose to invest our money and time. If we pay for tickets, buy the merchandise, or even stream these films, we’re supporting an industry that actively works to dismantle the moral and cultural foundation of our nation.

For that reason, I turn to Angel Studios, which has consistently provided films and series that uplift, educate, and entertain without compromising on principles. Angel Studios, unlike the purveyors of Wicked, creates content that celebrates the good, the moral, and the uplifting. Their commitment to quality storytelling and dedication to promoting traditional, wholesome values make them the kind of entertainment company worth supporting. In an age where Hollywood’s agenda seems fixed on tearing down, Angel Studios is committed to building up. Whether it’s historical dramas, inspirational stories, or family-friendly content, Angel Studios gives us an alternative to Hollywood’s constant push for ideological conformity.

I urge everyone to think twice before putting money into a film industry that’s lost its way. Wicked is only the latest example, but it's certainly not the last. Hollywood’s woke agenda will continue to find new ways to dismantle our traditions, attack our faith, and rewrite our history. As Christians, and particularly as members of the LDS Church, we must choose wisely where we invest our time, our money, and our minds. It’s time to let Hollywood know that we want stories that uplift, inspire, and teach—not those that indoctrinate.

Let’s turn our backs on Wicked and all like-minded films, and instead, support companies like Angel Studios, who are dedicated to producing content that aligns with our values and our faith.


Citations

  1. Kengor, Paul. The Devil and Karl Marx: Communism's Long March of Death, Deception, and Infiltration. TAN Books, 2020.
  2. Cawston, Steve. “Postmodern Anti-Heroes: The Influence of Nietzsche, Sartre and Camus.” Journal of Nietzsche Studies, vol. 51, no. 1, 2020, pp. 43-60.

No comments: