Pan-Turkism, Islamist Ideology, and the Cultural Appropriation of Iranic Scythian Heritage

Pan-Turkism, Islamist Ideology, and the Cultural Appropriation of Iranic Scythian Heritage

 

Pan-Turkism and Islamist ideologies have driven various political and cultural movements in contemporary geopolitics, particularly influencing the policies and rhetoric of Turkey under President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. This article examines how these ideologies contribute to the cultural appropriation of the historical legacies of Iranic peoples, including the Scythians, Sarmatians, Persians, Medes, and Parthians. Additionally, it explores Erdoğan's aspirations to establish a neo-Ottoman "super state" across Asia and Europe, aligning with these ideological frameworks.

The Foundations of Pan-Turkism

Pan-Turkism is an ideology that seeks to unite all Turkic-speaking peoples under a common political and cultural framework. It emerged in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, influenced by the collapse of the Ottoman Empire and the rise of nationalist movements. Pan-Turkists advocate for the cultural and political unification of Turkic nations, stretching from the Balkans to Central Asia.

The ideology often emphasizes a shared Turkic heritage, language, and history. This emphasis can sometimes lead to the appropriation and reinterpretation of historical narratives to align with Pan-Turkic goals. In particular, the legacies of Iranic peoples, who historically inhabited much of the region now claimed by Turkic states, become targets for appropriation.

Islamist Ideology and Its Influence

Islamist ideology, which seeks to integrate Islamic principles into political and social life, has also played a significant role in shaping the policies of modern Turkey. Under Erdoğan's leadership, Turkey has witnessed a resurgence of political Islam, influencing its domestic and foreign policies. This Islamist perspective often intersects with Pan-Turkism, promoting a vision of a unified Turkic-Islamic world.

Cultural Appropriation of Iranic Heritage

The cultural appropriation of Iranic heritage by Pan-Turkist and Islamist ideologies manifests in several ways:

Historical Revisionism: Historical narratives are often revised to minimize or negate the Iranic identity of ancient peoples. For example, the Scythians and Sarmatians, traditionally recognized as Iranic-speaking nomads, are sometimes rebranded as proto-Turks in Pan-Turkic historiography. This revisionism extends to other Iranic civilizations, including the Medes and Parthians, whose contributions to history are reinterpreted to fit a Turkic narrative.

Linguistic Appropriation: There is an attempt to reinterpret linguistic evidence to support Pan-Turkic claims. This involves suggesting that ancient Iranic languages were either influenced by or precursors to Turkic languages, despite significant linguistic evidence to the contrary.

Cultural Reinterpretation: Cultural symbols, artifacts, and traditions of Iranic peoples are recontextualized within a Turkic framework. This includes claiming Iranic artistic styles, architectural designs, and religious practices as part of Turkic heritage.

Erdoğan's Neo-Ottoman Ambitions

Erdoğan's vision for Turkey extends beyond its current borders, aiming to reestablish Turkish influence across regions once dominated by the Ottoman Empire. This neo-Ottoman ambition is closely tied to Pan-Turkic and Islamist ideologies.

Geopolitical Expansion: Erdoğan's foreign policy seeks to extend Turkey's influence across the Middle East, the Caucasus, Central Asia, and even into Europe. This involves diplomatic, economic, and military initiatives designed to forge stronger ties with Turkic-speaking nations and other Muslim-majority countries.

Cultural Diplomacy: Turkey actively promotes its cultural heritage abroad, often emphasizing a shared Turkic and Islamic identity. This is evident in the establishment of cultural centers, educational programs, and media outlets aimed at promoting Turkish culture and language.

Political Alliances: Erdoğan has cultivated alliances with other nations and political movements that align with Pan-Turkic and Islamist ideologies. This includes supporting Turkic nationalist movements in Central Asia and the Caucasus, as well as Islamist groups in the Middle East and North Africa.

Implications and Criticisms

The appropriation of Iranic heritage by Pan-Turkic and Islamist ideologies has significant implications:

Historical Integrity: The revision of historical narratives undermines the integrity of academic research and distorts the understanding of the region's complex past. It marginalizes the contributions of Iranic peoples and diminishes their historical significance.

Cultural Identity: This appropriation threatens the cultural identity of Iranic peoples, who face erasure and misrepresentation of their heritage. It creates tension between Turkic and Iranic communities, exacerbating ethnic and cultural conflicts.

Geopolitical Stability: Erdoğan's neo-Ottoman ambitions and the expansion of Turkish influence can destabilize the region. Efforts to reshape national identities and borders along Turkic-Islamist lines risk igniting conflicts and fostering regional instability.

Conclusion

The interplay between Pan-Turkism, Islamist ideology, and the cultural appropriation of Iranic heritage highlights the complex dynamics shaping contemporary Turkey's domestic and foreign policies. Erdoğan's pursuit of a neo-Ottoman "super state" across Asia and Europe aligns with these ideological frameworks, driving efforts to reinterpret and appropriate the legacies of ancient Iranic peoples. Understanding these forces is crucial for recognizing the implications for historical integrity, cultural identity, and geopolitical stability in the region.

References

Landau, J. M. (1995). Pan-Turkism: From Irredentism to Cooperation. Indiana University Press.

Zurcher, E. J. (2004). Turkey: A Modern History. I.B. Tauris.

Yavuz, M. H. (2009). Secularism and Muslim Democracy in Turkey. Cambridge University Press.

Allworth, E. (1990). The Tatars of Crimea: Return to the Homeland. Duke University Press.

Cornell, S. E. (2001). Small Nations and Great Powers: A Study of Ethnopolitical Conflict in the Caucasus. Routledge.

Caner, A. (2014). "Neo-Ottomanism in Turkey: The Dilemma of Political Islam and the Moderation of Turkish Foreign Policy," Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 16(2), 158-174.

Shnirelman, V. A. (2001). The Value of the Past: Myths, Identity and Politics in Transcaucasia. National Museum of Ethnology.

Suny, R. G. (1993). The Revenge of the Past: Nationalism, Revolution, and the Collapse of the Soviet Union. Stanford University Press.