Debunking Myths: The Kazakhs, Turkic Identity, and the Iranic Scythians

Debunking Myths: The Kazakhs, Turkic Identity, and the Iranic Scythians

The history of Central Asia is a complex tapestry woven with the interactions of various cultures, peoples, and empires. Among these, the Kazakhs, a Turkic ethnic group, and the Scythians, an ancient Iranic people, stand out for their significant historical roles. This article aims to clarify the distinctions between the Kazakhs and the Scythians, particularly addressing the misconception that the Kazakhs are Iranic Scythians, and to assert that the Issyk kurgans are Iranic, not Turkic.

The Ethnogenesis of the Kazakhs

The Kazakhs are a Turkic-speaking people who primarily inhabit Kazakhstan, with significant populations in Uzbekistan, Russia, and China. Their ethnogenesis is linked to the Turkic migration and expansion during the early medieval period, specifically around the 6th century CE. The Turks originated from the region of Mongolia and Siberia and gradually migrated westward, influencing and intermingling with the indigenous populations they encountered.

The Kazakhs, as a distinct group, emerged from this Turkic expansion. They are part of the Kipchak confederation, which dominated the steppes of Central Asia during the medieval period. Their language, culture, and identity are rooted in the Turkic tradition, characterized by nomadic pastoralism, a rich oral tradition, and a social structure based on tribal affiliations .

The Iranic Scythians: A Distinct Heritage

In contrast, the Scythians were an ancient Iranic-speaking people who flourished from around the 9th century BCE to the 2nd century CE. They are known for their mastery of horseback riding and archery, as well as their influential role in the early history of the Eurasian steppes. The Scythians were part of the larger Iranian group, sharing linguistic and cultural traits with other Iranian peoples like the Persians and Medes .

The Scythians' territory stretched from the northern Black Sea region across the steppes of what is now Ukraine, southern Russia, and Kazakhstan. They left behind a rich archaeological record, including kurgans (burial mounds) that contain elaborate grave goods, indicative of their social hierarchy and artistic achievements .

The Issyk Kurgan: An Iranic Legacy

One of the most significant archaeological sites associated with the Scythians is the Issyk kurgan, located near the city of Almaty in Kazakhstan. Discovered in 1969, the Issyk kurgan is renowned for its lavish burial of a Scythian prince, often referred to as the "Golden Man" due to the remarkable gold artifacts found within the tomb.

The Issyk kurgan provides crucial insights into the Scythian culture. The artifacts, including the famous gold diadem and intricately designed clothing, reflect the Scythian craftsmanship and their Iranic artistic traditions. The presence of inscriptions in an early form of the Saka language, a branch of the Eastern Iranian languages, further confirms the Iranic identity of the Scythians buried at Issyk .

Differentiating the Kazakhs from the Scythians

Despite geographical overlaps, the Kazakhs and the Scythians represent distinct cultural and ethnic entities. The primary distinctions lie in their linguistic, cultural, and temporal attributes:

1. Linguistic Differences: The Scythians spoke an Eastern Iranian language, while the Kazakhs speak a Turkic language. This fundamental difference in language roots each group in separate cultural and ethnic lineages .

2. Cultural Practices: While both groups practiced nomadism, their cultural expressions were different. Scythian art and artifacts display Iranic motifs and styles, whereas Kazakh culture is deeply influenced by Turkic traditions, including oral literature, music, and yurt-based nomadic lifestyles .

3. Historical Context: The Scythians thrived in the early first millennium BCE, long before the Turkic migrations that led to the formation of the Kazakh identity in the first millennium CE. This temporal gap underscores the distinct historical trajectories of the two groups .

Conclusion

The Kazakhs and the Scythians, despite sharing the same geographical space in Central Asia, are distinct peoples with different ethnic, linguistic, and cultural heritages. The Kazakhs belong to the Turkic family, emerging from the Turkic expansions of the medieval period, whereas the Scythians were an ancient Iranic people, with the Issyk kurgans standing as a testament to their rich Iranic culture. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for appreciating the diverse historical narratives that have shaped Central Asia.

---

Citations

1. Atwood, C. P. (2004). Encyclopedia of Mongolia and the Mongol Empire. Facts on File.
2. Golden, P. B. (1992). An Introduction to the History of the Turkic Peoples. Otto Harrassowitz.
3. Ivantchik, A. I. (1993). Scythian and Sarmatian Art: The Treasures of the Russian Steppes. Flammarion.
4. Rolle, R. (1989). The World of the Scythians. University of California Press.
5. Yablonsky, L. T. (2001). "The Material Culture of the Saka and Historical Reconstruction." The Archaeology and Art of the Kazakh Steppe.
6. Kuzmina, E. E. (2007). The Origin of the Indo-Iranians. Brill.
7. Schmitt, R. (1989). "Scythian Language." Encyclopaedia Iranica.
8. Sinor, D. (1990). The Cambridge History of Early Inner Asia. Cambridge University Press.
9. Sulimirski, T. (1985). "The Sarmatians." In J. Boardman, The Cambridge Ancient History. Cambridge University Press.