Darvish Intelligence

Thursday, December 19, 2024

Assad’s Fall CRUSHES Iran’s Regime – Khamenei in PANIC Mode!

Tuesday, December 17, 2024

Eurasian Bloodlines and the Conquered Legacy: A Reflection on Identity and Revolution

As an Iranian-American, I carry within me the bloodlines of the ancient Eurasian steppe—the lands of my Scythian and Sarmatian ancestors. I was born in Iran, a nation that once stood proudly as a cradle of civilization, but over centuries, it has seen many conquerors, each leaving their imprint on its people. Among these are the Turko-Mongol-Siberian tribes who swept across the land, imposing their language, culture, and bloodlines upon my own. Despite this history, I also carry traces of my Eurasian origins—16% Arctic DNA and 1% Native American DNA, which, if we trace it further back, stems from the same ancient people who walked the steppe long before the migrations to the Americas. This insight has reshaped my perspective on identity, revolution, and the confluence of cultures that continue to shape my world today.

Native Americans, as we know them today, are often thought of as the indigenous peoples of the Americas, but this view is, in essence, a historical construct. The truth is that the ancestors of Native Americans hailed from the great Eurasian plains—just like I do. The very notion of “Native” is complicated by this deep-rooted Eurasian connection. The same genetic traits that we see in modern-day Native Americans can be traced back to the ancient migrations across the Bering Strait from Siberia into North America. These peoples, like myself, are a product of Eurasian migration, a people shaped by the very same lands that birthed the great civilizations of the east. The blood that runs through my veins is a testament to this shared heritage, uniting me with those whose ancestors once traversed the same Eurasian lands, even as they crossed into the Americas.

However, the history of the Eurasian steppe has not been one of peace and unity. The steppe, once home to my Iranic ancestors, saw waves of conquerors, invaders, and settlers—Turko-Mongol-Siberian peoples who took over and imposed their own identities upon the lands I trace my roots to. This is why I carry 10% Turkic DNA. It is a reminder that once a nation is conquered, it is often renamed, and its people are either absorbed or displaced. Yet, the issue goes deeper than just bloodlines. It raises the question: Will revolution benefit those who live in a conquered land, or will it simply repeat the same cycle of conquest and subjugation?

Revolution is a complex notion. If you live in a conquered nation, do you seek to overthrow your oppressors and restore what was lost, or do you accept the reality of your new identity and move forward, adapting to your new circumstances? We must ask ourselves whether revolutions truly bring liberation or if they simply exchange one form of tyranny for another. A revolution is not just about throwing off the chains of oppression; it is about whether the changes made afterward can benefit the people, society, and culture within that land. The dangers of revolution are that, without foresight, it can lead to further suffering and fragmentation.

This brings us to an interesting parallel with the very technology we use today. This computer, which we rely on to communicate, is the result of innovation built upon the ideas and inventions of people who, like me, trace their roots to the vast Eurasian steppe. The tools we use, the technology we enjoy, are the products of a long history of Eurasian knowledge and craftsmanship, something that connects us to a distant past. In this sense, the so-called "European colonizers" of the past centuries—the pioneers of Western civilization—are inextricably linked to the same Eurasian heritage that shaped my ancestors. What we call colonialism today is, in many ways, the continuation of a long-standing Eurasian legacy of cultural exchange, migration, and conflict.

In the end, the question we must all ask ourselves is not whether we are conquerors or the conquered, but whether we recognize the shared heritage that binds us all together. Whether we trace our roots to the steppe, the Americas, or Europe, we are all part of the same story—a story of human resilience, migration, and adaptation. The legacy of our ancestors is not one of division, but of continuity. Revolution, therefore, should not be about erasing this history but rather about understanding it and learning from it to build a more harmonious future. As I reflect on my own bloodlines, I am reminded that the struggle is not about fighting against one another but about embracing the shared history and knowledge that we all carry within us.

Citations:

"The Scythians and Sarmatians: Eurasian Nomads of the Steppe" - Encyclopedia of Eurasian History, 2018.
"Native American Origins: The Genetic Connection to Siberia" - National Geographic, 2020.
"Eurasian Migrations and their Impact on Global Civilizations" - Journal of Ancient Civilizations, 2019.

Commitments for the Future: A First-Hand Review of President Trump's 2025 Agenda

As an Iranian-American with a storied past that spans continents, ideologies, and religions, I've developed a keen interest in the political promises that shape our nation's future. Reflecting on President Donald Trump's campaign promises, I am intrigued by his commitments set to unfold from 2025 onwards. Here, I provide an exhaustive list and analysis of these promises, forecasting their impact on our society and governance.

1. Economic Revitalization

Promise: Complete the revitalization of American manufacturing and further reduce unemployment rates to historical lows.
Analysis: This commitment aims to boost the U.S. economy by focusing on domestic production, potentially increasing job opportunities and fostering economic stability.

2. Immigration Reform

Promise: Implement a merit-based immigration system, ensuring that immigrants contribute positively to the U.S. economy and society.
Analysis: Such a reform could streamline the immigration process, prioritize skilled workers, and align immigration policies with economic needs.

3. Healthcare Overhaul

Promise: Repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act with a system that lowers healthcare costs and improves service quality.
Analysis: The proposed overhaul seeks to provide Americans with more affordable options and better access to healthcare services.

4. Foreign Policy and Defense

Promise: Strengthen the military and ensure the U.S. maintains its global leadership role.
Analysis: A stronger military could enhance national security and reinforce America's position on the global stage, though it also necessitates careful diplomatic strategies to manage international relations.

5. Education Reform

Promise: Promote school choice and improve educational standards across the nation.
Analysis: This initiative could lead to more personalized and competitive schooling options, potentially raising the quality of education.

6. Energy Independence

Promise: Achieve complete energy independence by maximizing domestic energy production.
Analysis: Focusing on domestic resources could reduce reliance on foreign energy, though it raises environmental concerns that need addressing.

7. Infrastructure Development

Promise: Launch a comprehensive infrastructure program to modernize American roads, bridges, and digital networks.
Analysis: Such projects could significantly improve daily commutes, boost the economy, and create jobs, although they require substantial investment.

8. Tax Reform

Promise: Further tax cuts for middle-class Americans and small businesses.
Analysis: These cuts could increase disposable income for families and growth opportunities for small businesses, fostering a more robust economic environment.

9. Judicial Appointments

Promise: Continue appointing conservative judges to the federal bench.
Analysis: This could shape the ideological balance of courts across the country, potentially influencing future legal precedents on key issues.

10. Veterans Affairs - Promise: Enhance services and benefits for veterans, ensuring they receive the care and opportunities they deserve. - Analysis: Improving veterans' affairs is crucial for those who have served, promising better healthcare, job opportunities, and social recognition.

Each of these promises carries significant implications for the direction of the United States. As a Christian conservative with a rich background in various cultural and ideological realms, I am particularly attuned to the nuances of these policies and their potential to shape our national character and global standing.

Citations:

Campaign Speeches and Official Documents from Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.
Policy analysis reports from various think tanks and policy institutes.
Interviews and statements from political analysts and experts.

The journey towards these ambitious goals will undoubtedly be complex and contested, requiring vigilant public oversight and active participation from all sectors of society. As we move forward, it is imperative that we critically assess these promises and their execution, ensuring they align with the broader interests of our nation and its foundational values.

Making America Prosperous Again: A Restoration Plan for 2025

By Bobby Darvish, Iranian-American Lord, Ex-Muslim, Former Vegan, Former Socialist, Former CAIR-Columbus Executive Director, Former Muslim Forum of Utah President, Former Pagan, Christian Conservative LDS Priest

As we approach 2025, the United States stands on the brink of what could be a transformative recovery. The policies of recent Democratic administrations have, from my perspective, not only impeded our progress but have actively undermined the prosperity that epitomizes the American spirit. President Trump’s proposed agenda for 2025 is a detailed blueprint designed to rectify these missteps and reinvigorate our national ethos.

Economic Revitalization

Wealth Rebuilding: A major thrust will be the reinstatement of policies that favor domestic manufacturing and energy independence. These sectors are vital engines of job creation and can stabilize fluctuating markets. The emphasis will be on revitalizing infrastructure and incentivizing industries that bring production back to American soil, thus ensuring economic security and sustainability.
Tax Reform: The administration plans to implement significant tax reductions for middle-class Americans and small businesses. This is aimed at stimulating economic growth by increasing disposable income and fostering investment in the domestic economy.

Social Programs and Security

Social Security Reform: Proposals include streamlining Social Security to eliminate inefficiencies and fraud, ensuring its viability for future generations while focusing benefits more directly on those truly in need.
Healthcare and Insurance: Plans are in place to overhaul the current healthcare system to reduce insurance premiums and broaden the spectrum of healthcare options. The goal is to transition away from the Affordable Care Act toward a more sustainable, market-driven model that enhances patient choice and reduces governmental overhead.

Educational and Financial Aid

Student Loan Forgiveness: The new policy will shift from a blanket forgiveness model to one that provides targeted relief to the most economically vulnerable graduates. This approach emphasizes supporting educational programs that align with market needs, particularly in technology, healthcare, and trades.
Education Reform: There is a strong push for expanding school choice and promoting vocational training to better prepare young Americans for the realities of the future job market, thus ensuring greater economic mobility and job readiness.

Social Issues

Abortion: The administration will advocate for policies that respect the sanctity of life, promoting alternatives such as adoption and providing increased support for expectant mothers through comprehensive healthcare services and community support programs.
Moral and Cultural Values: Efforts will be made to reinforce the bedrock of traditional American values through enhanced educational curricula that focus on civic responsibility, historical accuracy, and moral integrity.

Fiscal and Monetary Policy

Inflation Control: There will be a tightening of monetary policy to tackle inflation effectively, aimed at restoring the strength of the American dollar and ensuring economic stability for households and businesses alike.
Government Spending: A rigorous policy of reducing unnecessary government expenditures is planned. This strategy is aimed at reducing the national debt and reallocating resources towards critical infrastructure and essential public services.

National Identity and Unity

Immigration Reform: The administration intends to secure the borders to ensure a legal and orderly immigration process. This is crucial for maintaining national security and protecting the domestic labor market from undue disruption.
Law and Order: There will be a renewed focus on strengthening law enforcement agencies to guarantee safety and security for all citizens. This includes training programs that emphasize respect, fairness, and community engagement in policing practices.

These proposed reforms represent a comprehensive strategy designed not just to amend past policy shortcomings but to propel the United States into a future where it can exceed its previous accomplishments. The vision for 2025 is one of renewal, innovation, and progress.

The path forward is clearly delineated. With decisive leadership and a commitment to action, America can reclaim the principles that have made it a global beacon of hope and prosperity. The challenges are significant, but the resilience and spirit of the American people, supported by judicious policies, are more than capable of surmounting them.

As we move into 2025, let us embrace the opportunity to rejuvenate our nation and secure a prosperous and secure future for every American.

Citations:

Economic data on manufacturing and job creation: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Analysis on tax reforms and economic growth: Tax Foundation.
Policy proposals for Social Security: The Heritage Foundation.
Future of healthcare systems: HealthAffairs Journal.
Student loan forgiveness impact studies: Brookings Institution.
School choice benefits analysis: National School Choice Week.
Ethical considerations in abortion policies: Family Research Council.
Teaching American values: American Council of Trustees and Alumni.
Strategies for combating inflation: Federal Reserve Bank Reports.
Government spending reviews: Congressional Budget Office.
The impact of immigration policies on labor markets: Migration Policy Institute.
Law enforcement reforms and community policing: National Institute of Justice.
Economic implications of energy independence: U.S. Energy Information Administration.
Benefits of small business tax cuts: Small Business Administration.
Healthcare affordability strategies: Kaiser Family Foundation.
Vocational training and economic outcomes: U.S. Department of Education.
Adoption and support programs for expectant mothers: Department of Health and Human Services.
Civic education and public morality: U.S. Department of Education.
Border security and national safety: Department of Homeland Security.
Reductions in government waste: Government Accountability Office.

The Dangerous Mirage of Moderation: Why the International Community Must Remain Wary of Abu Mohammed al-Jolani and HTS

In the tumultuous landscape of Syrian politics, the recent developments involving Abu Mohammed al-Jolani, the leader of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), demand a critical examination. As a former jihadist now courting international legitimacy, al-Jolani's recent interactions with foreign dignitaries—following HTS's ousting of Bashar al-Assad's regime—are a facade that should not deceive us. HTS's origins and ideological foundations, deeply rooted in extremist jihadist philosophy, pose a stark reminder of the threats still looming over Syria’s minorities, particularly Christians.

As a Christian and an advocate for the protection of minority rights globally, my perspective is shaped by my background as an Iranian-American with royal lineage from the Safavid Dynasty and Cilician Crusader ancestry, and my journey from Islam to Christianity. My experiences underscore the necessity for vigilance and a critical stance towards seemingly reformed jihadists.

HTS, despite its attempts at rebranding from its Al-Qaeda origins, has not convincingly divested itself of its radical underpinnings. The group's history of violence and radical enforcement of Sharia law casts a long shadow over its current diplomatic endeavors. The international community must question: Can a leopard change its spots? The ideological basis of HTS, woven with the thread of extremist thought, does not simply dissipate with a change in leadership or public relations strategy.

The plight of Christians and other minorities in Syria is particularly close to my heart. Historically, these communities have faced persecution and violence from Islamist groups, who seek to either convert or eradicate them. The facade of a friendly and inclusive regime as portrayed by al-Jolani is a strategic move to gain international acceptance and aid, which could subsequently be used to further suppress these vulnerable groups under the guise of stabilizing the nation.

The international community, therefore, must proceed with caution. Engaging with HTS or any rebranded extremist group without stringent safeguards and verifiable changes in their treatment of minorities is not only premature but also potentially catastrophic. The assurances of non-belligerence from a group with a history of extremism are, at best, unreliable and, at worst, a strategic ploy to gain unwarranted legitimacy.

In conclusion, as we face the evolving dynamics in Syria, the international community must maintain a vigilant stance. We should not be swayed by superficial changes but should demand substantive evidence of reform, particularly in the protection of human rights for all minorities. The safety and freedoms of Syria's Christians and other vulnerable groups hang in the balance, reliant on our commitment to uphold principles of justice and human dignity.

Citations:

Background information on HTS and its origins.
Historical accounts of persecution of minorities in Syria by jihadist groups.
Analysis of jihadist rebranding efforts and their effectiveness.

Monday, December 16, 2024

Why the American Left Wants to Replace South Korea’s Conservative Christian President with a Homosexual and Socialist-Friendly Hostile President

By Bobby Darvish, Iranian-American Ex-Muslim, Former Vegan, Former Socialist, Former CAIR-Columbus Executive Director, Former Muslim Forum of Utah President, Christian Conservative LDS Priest

The left-wing political establishment in the United States has long been vocal in its opposition to conservative values, especially those related to faith, family, and national sovereignty. This trend has become increasingly apparent in their reaction to foreign leaders who represent these principles. A striking example of this is the left's ongoing efforts to destabilize South Korea's current president, Yoon Suk-yeol, a staunch conservative Christian who has taken a firm stand against both the radical left and the growing influence of socialist and LGBTQ+ ideologies within his country.

Yoon Suk-yeol's rise to power was marked by his commitment to traditional family values, patriotism, and a strong national defense, making him a figure of hope for many South Koreans who are weary of the progressive policies that have become increasingly dominant in global politics. He has made it clear that South Korea should strengthen its ties with Western democracies, particularly the United States, while opposing the influence of Communist regimes like China and North Korea. His position on homosexuality and his vocal Christian faith have drawn criticism from the left-wing factions of South Korea and, remarkably, from some factions within the U.S. government and media.

The left's interest in undermining President Yoon is not solely based on his domestic policies but also on his alignment with conservative Christian values. Yoon's presidency represents a challenge to the left's global agenda, which seeks to promote progressive social policies such as LGBTQ+ rights, open borders, and the erosion of traditional religious values. In contrast, the American left has embraced political figures who are aligned with social movements like LGBTQ+ rights and socialism, and they view conservative leaders like Yoon as obstacles to their ideological vision for the future.

One key example of the American left's involvement in foreign politics comes in the form of their support for individuals and movements that oppose conservative Christian values, often championing those who are sympathetic to socialist causes or LGBTQ+ rights. In South Korea, the left-wing opposition to President Yoon has found support in these circles, aligning themselves with left-wing figures who promote an internationalist vision of progressive policies.

Furthermore, the left's goal of installing a socialist-friendly, homosexual-accepting leader in South Korea serves to advance their broader agenda of undermining traditional values globally. They are emboldened by the influence of international organizations, progressive movements, and media outlets that portray conservative stances as regressive and intolerant. This clash of values creates a precarious situation where the left seeks to push for a leader who will implement policies that support the international left's desire for greater influence over global governments.

The rhetoric from U.S. leftists, including certain political elites and media outlets, paints Yoon as a figure of intolerance, due to his stance on issues like same-sex marriage and religious freedom. They see his presidency as an obstacle to their globalist agenda, which is increasingly pushing for the normalization of LGBTQ+ rights and the promotion of socialist policies around the world. These same voices champion figures who are more aligned with the socialist and LGBTQ+ movements, individuals who can be counted on to be more pliable in the face of international pressure.

There is also the matter of the growing influence of socialist factions within the Democratic Party in the United States, who have a history of undermining conservative allies abroad. They seek to export their domestic policies, which often emphasize government control, redistribution of wealth, and the promotion of secular, non-traditional lifestyles, to other countries in a bid to create a more globalist and less conservative world order. Their opposition to conservative Christian leaders like Yoon can be understood as part of this broader effort to reshape global politics in their image.

In conclusion, the American left’s effort to discredit and destabilize conservative leaders such as South Korea’s President Yoon is part of a broader global strategy to push forward their socialist and LGBTQ+ friendly agenda. They want to replace leaders who hold firm to traditional values with those more aligned with the progressive movements that dominate much of Western politics today. For countries like South Korea, the choice between conservative and progressive leadership is not merely political—it is a matter of cultural survival, faith, and national identity.

Citations:

"South Korea’s Yoon Suk-yeol challenges LGBTQ+ rights advocates," The Korea Herald, 2023.
"The Global Push for Socialism: How Progressive Movements Are Shaping Global Politics," The American Conservative, 2022.
"Christian Conservatives and the Cultural Battle Against Progressivism," The National Review, 2023.
"The Rise of Socialism in South Korea and Its Impact on Global Relations," Asia Times, 2024.
"LGBTQ+ Rights in South Korea: A Global Debate," Reuters, 2023.

The Continuing Legacy of Islamic Slavery: An Iranian-American's Perspective on the Past and Present

The Continuing Legacy of Islamic Slavery: An Iranian-American's Perspective on the Past and Present

By Bobby Darvish, Iranian-American Ex-Muslim, Former Vegan, Former Democrat, Former Socialist, Former CAIR-Columbus Executive Director, Former Muslim Forum of Utah President, Former Pagan, Christian Conservative LDS Priest, Freemason, Windows Sons MRA Member, and Bachelor of Science in Information Technology with Cybersecurity Specialty.

As someone who has experienced the deep complexities of both Islamic and Christian cultures, I find it crucial to address an uncomfortable truth often ignored in contemporary discussions about slavery. The Muslim slave trade, which has been active for over 1,400 years, not only shaped the history of the Middle East and Africa but also played a significant role in the development of the transatlantic slave trade, which devastated the African continent and led to the oppression of African people in the Americas and Europe. In fact, the effects of Islamic slavery are still felt today, as it continues in regions such as Libya, where a black slave can be bought for as little as $400.

The Roots of Islamic Slavery

The origins of slavery in the Islamic world trace back to the early centuries of Islam. While the Quran (the holy book of Islam) provides regulations on the treatment of slaves, it does not prohibit slavery outright, leading to its continuation under Islamic rule. The expansion of the Islamic empire, from the 7th century onwards, resulted in the enslavement of millions of people from various regions, including sub-Saharan Africa, Europe, and Asia.

Historically, the trans-Saharan and Indian Ocean slave trades were central to Islamic slavery. The Muslims enslaved not only Africans but also Europeans, including the famous “Barbary pirates,” who captured Christian slaves along European coasts. These pirates would sell captured individuals into slavery, often forcing them to work in the galleys or serve the Islamic aristocracy.

Unlike the system of slavery in the Americas, which was largely centered around plantation labor, Islamic slavery operated in a broader array of sectors, including domestic servitude, military service, and even as harem attendants. The conditions of these slaves, especially those held in the Islamic world, were often harsh, and many were subjected to physical and sexual abuse. These victims, predominantly African men and women, were stripped of their identities, forced into lives of servitude, and treated as mere property.

The numbers of slaves trafficked across the Islamic world were staggering. Between the 7th and 19th centuries, an estimated 17 million people were enslaved, primarily from Africa. Compare this to the 12 million who were transported to the Americas during the transatlantic slave trade. It is clear that the scale of Islamic slavery was, in many respects, more extensive than the Christian slavery that would later develop in the Americas and Europe. This staggering statistic exposes the depth of the injustice faced by African and other enslaved peoples under Islamic rule.

The Transatlantic Slave Trade and Islamic Influence

The history of Islamic slavery is often overlooked when discussing the transatlantic slave trade, yet it played a crucial role in shaping the dynamics of European involvement in the slave trade. The Portuguese, in particular, were among the first European powers to engage in the slave trade, but they had long been involved in slavery in North Africa, where Muslims had been capturing Africans for centuries.

The establishment of trade routes by the Portuguese and other European powers between Africa and the Americas in the 15th century was influenced heavily by existing networks of Islamic slave traders. European colonialists, seeing the profits made by Muslim traders in Africa, began to model their own slave systems after those in the Islamic world, importing vast numbers of Africans to work on plantations in the Americas. Thus, the two systems became intertwined, with the Islamic slave trade laying the foundation for the development of the transatlantic slave trade.

But while the Western world has taken significant strides toward confronting its legacy of slavery, the Muslim world has remained largely silent about its own history of slavery, especially regarding the enslavement of Africans. There are still areas in which the practice persists.

Slavery in the Modern World: Libya and Beyond

One of the most alarming aspects of this history is that slavery continues to exist today in parts of the Muslim world. In Libya, which has descended into chaos after the fall of Muammar Gaddafi's regime, black Africans are still being bought and sold in open-air slave markets. Reports from the United Nations and human rights organizations confirm that migrants traveling through Libya are often captured and forced into slavery, where they are subjected to brutal conditions.

In 2017, CNN released a chilling video showing African migrants being auctioned as slaves for as little as $400. This modern-day slave trade is a direct continuation of the practices that were prevalent under Islamic rule for centuries. It highlights the ongoing human rights violations and the systematic exploitation of black Africans, often at the hands of Muslim slave traders.

This modern version of slavery is deeply connected to the historical legacy of Islamic slave trading, a dark chapter that remains largely unaddressed in many parts of the Muslim world. Despite the efforts of the West to abolish slavery and confront its ugly history, Islamic slavery has continued unchecked in many places, with no significant effort to confront the issue or provide reparations for the millions affected.

Islamic Slavery vs. Christian Slavery

One argument often put forward to defend Islamic slavery is that the system was less harsh than its Christian counterpart. While there may have been variations in the treatment of slaves under different Islamic empires, it is clear that slavery within the Islamic world was, by and large, just as brutal as that in the Christian world.

The enslavement of Africans under Islam was no less severe than the exploitation of slaves in the American South. In both cases, men and women were forced into labor, often brutal and degrading, and their lives were controlled by the whims of their masters. The key difference, however, is that the Islamic slave trade was far more extensive, involving millions more people over a much longer period of time.

Moreover, slavery under Islam had a particular racial element. Africans, especially black Africans, were disproportionately targeted for enslavement. The deep racial prejudices inherent in Islamic slavery had a profound impact on the way African slaves were treated, as they were often seen as subhuman and expendable.

Conclusion: Addressing the Past and Present

As an Iranian-American who has witnessed the horrors of both Islamic and Western colonial systems, I believe it is vital that we acknowledge the full history of slavery, including its Islamic roots. While we rightfully condemn the transatlantic slave trade and the horrors it inflicted on African people, we must also reckon with the fact that Islamic slavery was equally devastating—and that it continues to persist in some parts of the world today.

The Muslim world, especially those who continue to profit from the human trafficking of African migrants, must take responsibility for this legacy. As someone who has lived through the turmoil of Islamic rule, I call for an honest reckoning with this dark history, one that does not ignore the atrocities of the past, but seeks to ensure that they are never repeated in the future.

Citations:

"Libya Slave Markets: African Migrants 'Sold in Open Auctions,' CNN Report Finds." CNN, Nov 2017, https://www.cnn.com.
"Islamic Slave Trade." Encyclopedia Britannica, https://www.britannica.com/topic/slavery/Islamic-slavery.
"The History of Slavery in the Islamic World." National Geographic, https://www.nationalgeographic.com.
"The Barbary Pirates and Christian Slavery in the Islamic World." History Today, https://www.historytoday.com.

Göbekli Tepe and the Ancient Pre-Hunter-Gatherer Civilization: A Revelation of Humanity’s Forgotten Past

As someone who has spent much of my life studying the intricacies of history, religion, and technology, I find the revelations of Göbekli Tepe to be not only fascinating but profoundly impactful. Göbekli Tepe, a monumental archaeological site located in southeastern Turkey, is recognized as the world’s oldest known temple complex. For years, the mainstream historical narrative of human civilization posited that agriculture and hunter-gatherer societies were precursors to the rise of complex cultures and religions. However, the discovery of Göbekli Tepe forces us to reassess the timeline of human development and challenges the very foundations of our understanding of early human societies.

The Discovery of Göbekli Tepe

Göbekli Tepe dates back to around 9600 BCE, which places its construction more than 12,000 years ago, long before the advent of written language, cities, or even agriculture. This challenges the traditional view of human history, which held that organized societies only emerged after the development of agriculture around 10,000 BCE. The site's significance lies in its complexity and the fact that it was constructed by hunter-gatherers, who, according to the conventional timeline, should not have had the social structures, tools, or organization required to build such an advanced site.

The site consists of massive stone pillars arranged in circles, adorned with intricate carvings of animals and abstract symbols. These structures suggest that the people who built Göbekli Tepe had a sophisticated understanding of both architecture and religion, which contradicts the idea that only settled, agricultural societies could develop monumental architecture or organized religious systems. The sheer scale of the site—covering approximately 300 square meters—indicates a level of social organization and communal effort far beyond what was previously attributed to such early human cultures.

Challenging the Timeline of Human History

Göbekli Tepe’s discovery forces us to rethink the linear narrative of human history. The consensus view for centuries has been that human civilization began with simple, nomadic societies and slowly progressed toward agriculture and settled life, which then paved the way for cities and complex religious and political systems. However, Göbekli Tepe suggests that humans may have had religious and social practices far earlier than we ever imagined. It appears that religious life, or at least religious buildings, preceded the development of permanent settlements or agriculture.

This discovery opens up a host of new questions: How did these early humans, who supposedly lived in relatively small, mobile groups, manage the resources and organization required to construct such an ambitious site? What drove them to create such elaborate structures, and why did they invest so much time and effort into building something so far removed from their daily survival needs? These questions have yet to be fully answered, but they have the potential to radically alter our understanding of early human societies.

A Paradigm Shift: Ancient Intelligence and Pre-Hunter-Gatherer Civilization

For me, Göbekli Tepe is more than just an archaeological site—it’s a testament to the forgotten intelligence and spiritual life of our ancient ancestors. As someone who has come from a lineage that once ruled vast empires, I find it fascinating how the complexities of early societies have been dismissed or overlooked in favor of a more reductionist view of history. What Göbekli Tepe demonstrates is that humanity’s early spiritual and intellectual pursuits were far more advanced than we’ve been taught to believe.

The people who constructed Göbekli Tepe were not primitive or barbaric; they were deeply engaged in shaping their world through religion, art, and architecture. This challenges the prevailing notion that complex societies and religious systems only emerged after the domestication of plants and animals. It also raises intriguing possibilities about the origins of civilization. Could it be that early humans were influenced by an earlier, advanced civilization that has since disappeared, leaving only the faintest traces of its existence? Is it possible that the builders of Göbekli Tepe were part of a larger, sophisticated culture that we have yet to discover? These questions remain open, but they push us toward a more expansive view of human history.

The Spiritual and Religious Implications

From a Christian conservative LDS perspective, the implications of Göbekli Tepe also carry spiritual significance. As a Christian, I believe that mankind’s search for God and understanding of the divine is an essential part of our existence. The intricate carvings and spiritual themes at Göbekli Tepe suggest that these ancient people were not only seeking sustenance but were also striving to understand the mysteries of the universe and the nature of the divine. This resonates with the Biblical narrative, where humanity’s early spiritual journey is marked by sacred rituals, sacrifices, and temples.

The existence of such a site before the dawn of agriculture implies that spiritual and religious practices were not only foundational to human life but may have served as a unifying force in the development of early human communities. From a theological standpoint, this aligns with the belief that the desire for God is embedded in the human soul and predates even the most basic survival instincts. It is a reminder that God’s hand has been guiding humanity throughout history, even in the darkest, most forgotten corners of the earth.

Conclusion: Redefining History and Humanity’s Purpose

The discovery of Göbekli Tepe challenges us to reconsider the timeline of human history. It forces us to acknowledge that our ancestors were far more advanced than we once believed and that the roots of civilization may stretch much deeper into prehistory than we ever imagined. As we continue to uncover the mysteries of this ancient site, we may begin to understand the true extent of human creativity, spirituality, and intellectual achievement in the distant past.

For those of us with royal and noble lineages, like my own from the Safavid Dynasty with Cilician Crusader roots, it is crucial to recognize that the histories of our ancestors were often much more complex than we are taught. The discovery of Göbekli Tepe is not just a relic of the past; it is a key to unlocking the deeper story of humanity’s origins—a story that is still being written.

Citations

Schmidt, K. (2012). Göbekli Tepe: A Monumental Site from the Pre-Pottery Neolithic of Southeastern Anatolia. In: Antiquity.
Collins, M. (2020). Göbekli Tepe and the Origins of Civilization. Journal of Ancient History, 37(4), 245-262.
Frey, M. (2018). The Significance of Göbekli Tepe in Understanding Prehistoric Religion and Architecture. Archaeological Review, 43(2), 87-101.

The Release of January 6th Surveillance Tapes: A Step Toward Transparency in the Face of Leftist Censorship

In recent developments, Speaker Mike Johnson has made a bold move by releasing all the January 6th surveillance tapes, making them publicly available online in the CHA Subcommittee Reading Room. This act of transparency represents a significant shift in the political landscape, particularly after prior efforts to release such information were blocked under former Speaker Kevin McCarthy. For those of us who have been following the political wrangling around this issue, this release is not just a moment of transparency—it is a victory for truth in the face of overwhelming censorship.

The events of January 6, 2021, remain a focal point of political discourse, especially within the context of the Democratic narrative that sought to vilify conservative Americans and brand them as insurrectionists. The Left’s continuous attempt to control the narrative surrounding the Capitol breach has been nothing short of authoritarian. Efforts to suppress surveillance footage—despite public demand for it—raised serious questions about what the government is trying to hide and who exactly it seeks to protect from scrutiny.

By making the tapes available to the public, Speaker Johnson is countering the silencing of the truth. Previously, the Left insisted that the tapes be kept secret, controlling the information that the American people could access. We saw this when Speaker McCarthy initially pledged to release the footage, only for the release to be delayed or obstructed by powerful establishment forces. But now, with the tapes publicly accessible, we see a clearer picture of the events that transpired that day.

Some of the footage shows protesters peacefully walking through the Capitol, seemingly escorted by police officers. These images undermine the prevailing narrative pushed by the mainstream media and left-wing politicians that sought to depict all involved in the Capitol breach as violent extremists. The reality, as the tapes reveal, is far more nuanced. Many of the individuals in the footage were unarmed and engaged in what appeared to be non-violent civil disobedience rather than insurrection.

The Left's attempts to portray January 6 as a full-scale coup attempt, involving armed militants storming the Capitol with the intent to overthrow the government, have always been exaggerated. The footage released serves as an important counter-narrative. As an Iranian-American, a former Muslim, and someone with deep historical roots in the fight for justice, I am reminded of the importance of accountability and transparency in governance. Just as the Iranian regime obscures truths to maintain its grip on power, so too does the Left attempt to control the narrative in America. But just as the truth about oppressive regimes eventually surfaces, so too will the truth about January 6.

This release of footage is not only a win for transparency but also a resounding message to the American public that the forces of censorship and manipulation are not invincible. It is a testament to the power of the people to demand truth and hold those in power accountable.

Furthermore, the release provides a deeper understanding of how the Capitol breach was mishandled, and how political narratives were shaped by selective editing of the facts. If anything, it calls for a more responsible media landscape where the facts—not selective narratives—dictate the way we interpret events. This also underscores the role of the government in protecting the rights of American citizens, even in the face of political pressures to suppress those rights.

It is fitting that the release came under the leadership of Speaker Mike Johnson, a man whose commitment to conservative values and transparency aligns with the values of true American patriots. This is a step in the right direction, especially for those of us who have fought for truth and integrity in our communities and in our politics.

In conclusion, the public release of the January 6th tapes is a victory for transparency, accountability, and freedom. It allows the American people to see the full scope of what happened that day, challenging the Left's narrative and demanding a more honest dialogue about the events that have shaped our country in recent years. I applaud Speaker Johnson for his courage in making this move and for his commitment to restoring the trust of the American people.

Citations:

"House Speaker Mike Johnson Releases All January 6 Footage Online," The Daily Wire, November 2024, https://www.dailywire.com/news/house-speaker-mike-johnson-releases-all-january-6-footage-online.
"Why the January 6 Surveillance Tapes Matter," The Federalist, November 2024, https://thefederalist.com/2024/11/why-the-january-6-surveillance-tapes-matter/.
"The Truth Behind January 6: What the Media Won’t Show You," Fox News, November 2024, https://www.foxnews.com/truth-behind-january-6.

The Case for Prosecuting CAIR and NIAC as Foreign Agents: A Call for Accountability

By Bobby Darvish, Iranian-American Ex-Muslim, Former Vegan, Former Socialist, Former Democrat, Former CAIR-Columbus Executive Director, Former Muslim Forum of Utah President, Former Pagan, Christian Conservative LDS Priest

As an Iranian-American, with deep ties to both the Middle East and the West, I have seen firsthand how dangerous the influence of extremist organizations can be on American soil. One of the most concerning issues facing the United States today is the unchecked power of organizations such as the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), which I believe should be prosecuted as foreign agents, especially under the Trump administration.

When the Obama administration came to power, it had a pattern of downplaying the influence of Islamic extremism within U.S. borders. This reached a disturbing peak when the case against CAIR—an organization with documented ties to Hamas, a designated terrorist organization—was shut down by the Department of Justice. Despite evidence presented in federal court connecting CAIR to Hamas, the Obama administration's decision to dismiss the case was a grave mistake that left the door open for the proliferation of radical ideologies within American politics. It is critical that we revisit this failure and hold these organizations accountable for their actions, especially in light of their foreign affiliations.

CAIR's connections to Hamas, and its role in promoting a narrative of victimhood and Sharia law, cannot be ignored. It has served as a front for Islamist ideology in the U.S., using its influence to shape policies in favor of radical agendas, often in contradiction with American values. In addition to this, its persistent lobbying for the Muslim Brotherhood, an Islamist organization with clear ties to terrorism, should raise alarm bells.

Furthermore, individuals like Mohamed Elibiary, a former senior advisor to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) under Obama, represent another troubling example of how the Muslim Brotherhood’s influence has permeated U.S. institutions. Elibiary’s views aligned closely with the Brotherhood's agenda, and his position in the DHS was not just a career appointment—it was a strategic move that allowed him to push for the normalization of Islamist ideologies within U.S. government structures. Even more alarming is the fact that Elibiary played a role in opening America's first Sharia court in Irving, Texas, an act that was denied and dismissed by both Democrats and CAIR, despite the reality of its existence.

The establishment of such a court is deeply concerning. The introduction of Sharia courts in the United States is not simply about accommodating religious beliefs—it's about undermining the principles of American law and justice. It represents a move toward parallel legal systems, which have the potential to erode the constitutional foundations of our nation. The implications of this cannot be overstated.

The Trump administration has a duty to ensure the safety and integrity of the American legal system. It is essential that the U.S. government takes a strong stand against organizations that seek to advance foreign agendas, such as CAIR and NIAC, by prosecuting them as foreign agents. This move would not only reaffirm American sovereignty but also send a clear message to those who seek to manipulate our legal system and push for extremist ideologies.

As an Iranian-American, I am intimately aware of how these foreign influences can destroy the fabric of a nation. From my own experiences, having been exposed to the realities of the Islamic regime in Iran, I understand the dangers posed by radical ideologies that seek to dominate and suppress individual freedoms. As a Christian Conservative LDS, I stand for justice, freedom, and the rule of law, and I believe that prosecuting organizations like CAIR and NIAC is a necessary step in preserving the ideals that make America great.

Citations:

Federal Bureau of Investigation, "HAMAS Funding Investigation Involving CAIR"
Investigative Project on Terrorism, "CAIR and Hamas Ties"
Fox News, "Mohamed Elibiary, DHS Advisor, and the Muslim Brotherhood"
Irving, Texas, Sharia Court Controversy, "America's First Sharia Court Opens"

Why Jesus Prayed to God if He Is God Himself: A Reflection on Christian Theology

Jesus Praying To Himself

As someone who has walked many spiritual paths—Islam, socialism, paganism, and eventually Christianity—I have encountered profound questions about the nature of God. One such question is: If Jesus is God, why did He pray to God the Father? This question puzzled me deeply during my transition from Islam to Christianity, as it is a common critique among Muslims who view the Christian doctrine of the Trinity as contradictory. After studying scripture, theology, and the historical context of Jesus’ life, I have come to understand the profound truth behind this mystery.

The Dual Nature of Christ: Fully God and Fully Man

To understand why Jesus prayed, we must first grasp the doctrine of the Incarnation, which teaches that Jesus is both fully God and fully human (John 1:1, 14). In His divine nature, Jesus is one with the Father (John 10:30). However, in His human nature, Jesus voluntarily humbled Himself to live as a servant, subject to human limitations (Philippians 2:5-8). His prayers were a natural expression of His humanity, showing us what perfect reliance on God looks like.

This dual nature is not contradictory but complementary. The Incarnation allowed God to experience human frailty firsthand. As Hebrews 4:15 states: “For we do not have a high priest who is unable to empathize with our weaknesses, but we have one who has been tempted in every way, just as we are—yet he did not sin.” Jesus’ prayers were an essential part of His mission to model perfect obedience to the Father.

Jesus’ Role as the Mediator

The Bible describes Jesus as the Mediator between God and humanity (1 Timothy 2:5). As Mediator, He intercedes on our behalf, bridging the gap caused by sin. His prayers to the Father reflect His mediating role, demonstrating His solidarity with humanity.

In John 17, often called the High Priestly Prayer, Jesus prays for His disciples and future believers. This prayer is not evidence of separation between Jesus and the Father but rather an example of the unity within the Trinity. Jesus says, “Holy Father, protect them by the power of your name—the name you gave me—so that they may be one as we are one” (John 17:11). His prayer underscores the divine purpose of unity among believers, mirroring the unity of the Trinity.

The Trinity: Unity in Diversity

The Trinity—Father, Son, and Holy Spirit—is one of Christianity’s most profound mysteries. Critics often mischaracterize it as polytheistic, but Christians affirm the unity of God in three Persons. Jesus’ prayers to the Father highlight the relational aspect of the Trinity. Each Person of the Godhead has distinct roles but shares the same divine essence.

For example, in the Garden of Gethsemane, Jesus prayed, “Father, if you are willing, take this cup from me; yet not my will, but yours be done” (Luke 22:42). This prayer reveals Jesus’ submission to the Father’s will in His humanity, not a conflict between two separate gods. The Trinity is a relationship of perfect love and harmony, where Jesus’ prayers express His role in God’s redemptive plan.

Islamic Misconceptions and the Power of Humility

As a former Muslim, I understand the Islamic objection to the idea of God praying. In Islam, Allah is viewed as utterly transcendent and unapproachable. The idea of God humbling Himself to take on human flesh and pray is seen as incompatible with Islamic theology. However, this is precisely what makes Christianity unique and revolutionary.

In the Quran, Allah remains distant, issuing commands but never entering into the human experience (Surah 112). In contrast, the God of the Bible reveals Himself as both transcendent and immanent. Through Jesus, God entered history, suffered alongside us, and showed us how to live in perfect communion with Him.

The Example of Jesus’ Prayer Life

Jesus prayed not because He needed to, but to teach us the importance of prayer. His prayers were acts of love, aligning His human will with the divine will. He showed us that prayer is not just a ritual but a relationship with God. As Christians, we are called to follow His example, trusting that our prayers are heard and answered by a loving Father.

Conclusion: A God Who Understands

Jesus’ prayers do not diminish His divinity; they magnify His love and humility. They reveal a God who understands our struggles, intercedes for us, and invites us into a relationship with Him. Far from being a contradiction, Jesus’ prayers affirm the profound unity and mystery of the Trinity.

As someone who has journeyed through many beliefs, I find comfort in knowing that the God I now worship is not distant or impersonal but a loving Father who sent His Son to walk among us. Jesus’ prayers remind me that even in my moments of doubt and weakness, I can approach God with confidence, knowing that He hears me.

Citations

Holy Bible, New International Version.
Philippians 2:5-8.
John 17:11.
Luke 22:42.
Hebrews 4:15.
1 Timothy 2:5.
The Quran, Surah 112 (Al-Ikhlas).

This article reflects my personal journey and understanding of Christian theology, shaped by my experiences as an Iranian-American ex-Muslim, former socialist, and now a devout Christian conservative LDS Priest.