Wednesday, November 20, 2024

Metallosis: The Hidden Danger of Metal-on-Metal Joint Replacements

 Metallosis: The Hidden Danger of Metal-on-Metal Joint Replacements

By Bobby Darvish, Iranian-American Ex-Muslim, Former Vegan, Former Democrat, Former Socialist, Former CAIR-Columbus Executive Director, Former Muslim Forum of Utah President, Christian Conservative LDS, Freemason, Windows Sons MRA Member, Bachelor of Science in Information Technology with Cybersecurity Speciality

As someone who has dedicated much of my life to uncovering truth and helping others navigate challenges, I feel compelled to shed light on a medical issue that has serious, yet often overlooked, implications: metallosis. This rare but significant complication arises from metal-on-metal (MoM) joint replacements and has the potential to harm your kidneys, cause blood in your urine, and much more.

Understanding Metallosis

Metallosis occurs when metallic debris, typically containing cobalt or chromium, accumulates in the body’s tissues due to the wear of MoM implants. These implants were once touted for their durability and suitability for active individuals. However, the friction between the metal surfaces can release tiny particles into surrounding tissues and the bloodstream, leading to toxicity and inflammation.

The Risk to Your Kidneys

The kidneys are vital organs responsible for filtering toxins from the blood. When significant amounts of cobalt or chromium enter the bloodstream, the kidneys may become overwhelmed. Over time, this exposure can damage kidney cells, impair function, and potentially lead to kidney disease. One telltale sign of kidney issues stemming from metallosis is hematuria, or blood in the urine. This symptom may manifest visibly or be detectable only through laboratory analysis.

Other Symptoms of Metallosis

In addition to kidney-related issues, metallosis can present with a range of symptoms, including:

Pain or swelling near the implant site.

Fatigue or general malaise.

Cognitive difficulties, such as memory loss or confusion.

Neurological issues in severe cases of metal poisoning, including balance problems or tremors.

Diagnosing and Addressing Metallosis

If you suspect metallosis, early intervention is critical. Consult a specialist who can perform blood tests to measure metal ion levels, assess kidney function, and conduct imaging studies to examine the implant and surrounding tissues. Early detection allows for a range of interventions, from medication to reduce inflammation to surgical revision or removal of the implant in severe cases.

My Perspective as a Former Vegan and Advocate for Wellness

In my journey from being a former vegan and socialist to becoming a Christian conservative, I’ve learned the importance of balance—not just ideologically, but in our bodies. While modern medicine has its miracles, it also has its pitfalls. Metallosis is a stark reminder that technological advances can have unforeseen consequences. Just as I’ve re-examined and redefined my own beliefs, we must also question and thoroughly evaluate the medical treatments we adopt.

Final Thoughts

For those with MoM joint replacements or considering joint surgery, it’s crucial to be informed. Be proactive about your health by discussing these risks with your doctor, especially if you experience unexplained symptoms. By staying vigilant, you can safeguard your health and avoid potentially severe complications.

Citations

Pandit, H., et al. "The Prevalence of Metallosis in Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacements." Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.

Bradberry, S. M., et al. "Cobalt Poisoning: Complications from Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacements." Clinical Toxicology.

Matharu, G. S., et al. "Blood Metal Ion Levels as a Biomarker for Implant Performance." The Lancet Rheumatology.

Zywiel, M. G., et al. "Severe Systemic Cobalt Poisoning in a Patient with Hip Replacement." The Journal of Arthroplasty.

Langton, D. J., et al. "Tissue Reactions to Metal Wear Debris in Total Hip Arthroplasty." Orthopaedic Proceedings.

I Stand with Rudy Giuliani: A National Hero Who Defied Corruption

I Stand with Rudy Giuliani: A National Hero Who Defied Corruption
By Bobby Darvish, Iranian-American Ex-Muslim, Former Vegan, Former Democrat, Former Socialist, Former CAIR-Columbus Executive Director, Former Muslim Forum of Utah President, Christian Conservative LDS

Rudy Giuliani is a name that echoes through American history as a symbol of justice, courage, and unyielding resolve. As an Iranian-American ex-Muslim, former Democrat, and former socialist who has seen firsthand the destructive tendencies of corruption and authoritarianism, I stand firmly in defense of Giuliani. His legacy as the man who took down the mafia, defended President Donald Trump, and refused to be silenced by leftist attacks makes him a national hero worthy of our admiration.

The Man Who Took Down the Mafia

During his tenure as the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York in the 1980s, Giuliani waged a groundbreaking war against organized crime. Using the RICO Act (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act), Giuliani dismantled the iron grip of the Five Families of New York—Gambino, Genovese, Lucchese, Bonanno, and Colombo. This was no small feat. The mafia controlled vast swathes of the city's economy and wielded immense political influence. Giuliani’s successful prosecutions resulted in convictions of top mob bosses, including Paul Castellano and Anthony “Fat Tony” Salerno, crippling their operations and restoring law and order to New York City【1】.

His courage in taking on the mafia showed a level of resolve that most prosecutors would never dare attempt. Giuliani's fight against organized crime wasn’t just about upholding the law—it was a battle for the soul of America. By dismantling these criminal empires, he restored faith in the rule of law and proved that no one, not even the most powerful crime syndicates, is above justice.

America’s Mayor: The 9/11 Legacy

As the Mayor of New York City during the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, Giuliani demonstrated unparalleled leadership in one of the darkest times in American history. His swift response, empathy, and dedication to rebuilding the city earned him the moniker “America’s Mayor.” Giuliani reminded us what real leadership looks like: selfless, courageous, and unyielding under pressure. He became a symbol of national unity and resilience during a time of fear and uncertainty【2】.

Defending President Trump and America

In recent years, Giuliani has taken a prominent role in defending President Donald Trump against politically motivated attacks and legal challenges. His loyalty to Trump is rooted in a shared belief in the America First agenda, which seeks to protect our borders, restore economic independence, and preserve constitutional freedoms.

Despite facing relentless attacks from the mainstream media, the Democratic Party, and even members of the Republican establishment, Giuliani has remained steadfast in his convictions. His unwavering commitment to exposing electoral fraud and standing up to leftist authoritarianism highlights his enduring fight for the truth and justice, even at great personal cost【3】【4】.

A Hero Who Refuses to Be Bought

In today’s political climate, where so many are willing to sell out their principles for money or power, Giuliani stands as a man of integrity. The left’s attacks on him are not a reflection of his failures but a testament to his success in challenging their corrupt systems. Having once been a part of organizations like CAIR and the Democratic Party, I recognize the tactics used by those who seek to suppress voices like Giuliani’s.

The attacks against him are reminiscent of the tactics communists and Islamists use to silence dissent and consolidate control. Giuliani’s defiance proves he cannot be bought or intimidated. For this, he deserves our unwavering support.

Why This Matters

As an Iranian-American Christian conservative, I see Giuliani’s fight as part of a broader battle to preserve the freedoms that make America great. He embodies the values of courage, justice, and unwavering patriotism—qualities we desperately need in a time when our nation is under siege by Marxists, globalists, and those who seek to dismantle our constitutional republic.

Rudy Giuliani is not just a man of the past; he is a beacon for America’s future. I stand with Giuliani because he has stood for us—for the rule of law, for truth, and for freedom.


Citations

  1. "Rudy Giuliani: Prosecutor and Mayor." History.com. https://www.history.com/topics/us-government/rudy-giuliani
  2. Giuliani, Rudolph. Leadership. Miramax Books, 2002.
  3. Barron, James. "Rudy Giuliani’s Fight Against Election Fraud: A Timeline." New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/10/us/rudy-giuliani-election-fraud.html
  4. Brown, Hayes. "Giuliani's Role in Trump’s Legal Battles." NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-legal-fights-rudy-giuliani

The Fragility of Freedom: Why Oversensitivity Undermines Brotherhood and Liberty

The Fragility of Freedom: Why Oversensitivity Undermines Brotherhood and Liberty

By Bobby Darvish, Iranian-American Ex-Muslim, Former Vegan, Former Democrat, Former Socialist, Former CAIR-Columbus Executive Director, Former Muslim Forum of Utah President, Christian Conservative LDS

Freedom and brotherhood are two ideals that have shaped my identity, beliefs, and journey through life. As an Iranian-American ex-Muslim and a convert to Christianity within the LDS Church, I have experienced oppressive systems of thought control firsthand, from the theocratic grip of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the ideological rigidity of leftist circles in America. Whether in my role as a former executive director of CAIR-Columbus, a cybersecurity professional, or a member of fraternal organizations like the Freemasons, I have come to see a disturbing trend across various institutions: an oversensitivity to dissent or nonconformity that betrays the very principles of freedom and brotherhood these groups claim to uphold.

Control Masquerading as Order

In many families, companies, or organizations, rules and constitutions are essential for cohesion. However, when these rules are weaponized to silence individuals for merely expressing opinions that seem to “violate” the group’s norms, it signals a shift from collaboration to control. I have seen this firsthand, particularly in organizations that outwardly profess commitment to freedom but practice subtle authoritarianism.

For example, during my time with CAIR, I witnessed how any critique of Islamic doctrines, even when raised constructively, was met with hostility. This is not limited to religious organizations; progressive groups on the left often enforce unwritten codes of speech and behavior under the guise of “inclusivity” or “equity.” Ironically, such environments become echo chambers where true freedom of thought cannot exist.

The Brotherhood Dilemma

Brotherhood implies trust, understanding, and the ability to disagree without fear of reprisal. As a Freemason, I have seen how fraternal bonds can be strengthened through open dialogue and diverse perspectives. Yet, even within such circles, there can be a temptation to conflate unity with uniformity.

In a family or workplace, this dynamic often manifests as over-policing conversations. The result is a stifling atmosphere where members are afraid to speak freely, fearing that any misstep might lead to ostracism. This not only discourages innovation and growth but also erodes the very trust that brotherhood requires.

The LDS Perspective on Freedom and Agency

As a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, I cherish the doctrine of agency—the God-given right to choose and act according to one’s conscience. Agency is central to the gospel of Jesus Christ, emphasizing that genuine faith and unity can only emerge from free will, not coercion.

The scriptures warn against the compulsion of others. Doctrine and Covenants 121:39 states, “We have learned by sad experience that it is the nature and disposition of almost all men, as soon as they get a little authority, as they suppose, they will immediately begin to exercise unrighteous dominion.” Oversensitivity to perceived rule-breaking often leads to such dominion, as leaders or members become gatekeepers of thought rather than stewards of freedom.

Lessons from Personal Transformation

My journey from being a vegan socialist to a Christian conservative taught me the importance of humility and open-mindedness. At one point, I believed in rigid ideological frameworks that labeled dissenters as enemies. It wasn’t until I began to question these beliefs that I found true freedom in Christ and the Constitution.

This same freedom allowed me to see the flaws in systems that claim to champion liberty but instead demand uncritical conformity. Whether it’s a political party, a company, or even a religious institution, the litmus test of its commitment to freedom lies in how it handles disagreement.

A Call to Courageous Freedom

If we are to build organizations, families, and societies that genuinely value freedom and brotherhood, we must reject the culture of oversensitivity. Instead, we must embrace robust dialogue, the kind that refines ideas and strengthens bonds.

The alternative is a slow descent into tyranny, where control masquerades as order and fear replaces trust. Let us remember that true freedom is not merely the absence of restraint but the presence of opportunities to speak, think, and act without undue fear of reprisal.

Citations

  1. Doctrine and Covenants 121:39. Available at churchofjesuschrist.org.
  2. Tocqueville, Alexis de. Democracy in America. Harper & Brothers, 1835.
  3. Mill, John Stuart. On Liberty. Penguin Books, 1859.
  4. Sennett, Richard. The Fall of Public Man. W.W. Norton & Company, 1977.
  5. Haidt, Jonathan. The Coddling of the American Mind: How Good Intentions and Bad Ideas Are Setting Up a Generation for Failure. Penguin Books, 2018.

Trump Needs to Gut the Deep State of Its Globalist Red-Green Axis Infiltrators and Get Rid of the Woke Cultists

 Trump Needs to Gut the Deep State of Its Globalist Red-Green Axis Infiltrators and Get Rid of the Woke Cultists

By Bobby Darvish
Iranian-American Ex-Muslim, Former Vegan, Former Democrat, Former Socialist, Former CAIR-Columbus Executive Director, Former Muslim Forum of Utah President, Christian Conservative LDS, Freemason, Windows Sons MRA Member, Bachelors of Science in Information Technology with Cybersecurity Speciality

The recent political landscape has revealed something that is not just dangerous but deeply disturbing—our country is under siege by forces both external and internal. In this article, I’ll outline why Donald Trump, should he regain power, needs to take decisive action against the “Deep State,” specifically targeting the infiltration of globalist operatives and the destructive influence of the woke cultists who have infested our institutions.

The Globalist Red-Green Axis

The Red-Green Axis refers to the unholy alliance between leftist globalists and radical Islamists who work together, often in silence, to undermine Western civilization. This alliance is a significant threat to the United States and its way of life. As an Iranian-American who has personally experienced the consequences of radical Islam, I see the dangers that this axis poses to the West. Radical Islam, through its proxies and sympathizers, often works hand-in-hand with far-left ideologues who seek to advance their Marxist agenda. This collaboration is neither accidental nor benign—it is a carefully orchestrated effort to weaken our republic.

The globalist agenda, championed by elites in international organizations, corporations, and even governments, has been a source of constant erosion of American sovereignty. These elites prioritize a global order over national sovereignty, pushing for open borders, transnational governance, and a dilution of American values in favor of collectivist ideals that serve their interests.

These forces have infiltrated key aspects of American government, media, and educational systems. We see this in the form of policies that weaken our borders, enrich the global elite at the expense of American workers, and increasingly align the U.S. with countries that seek to undermine us—whether through trade deals that benefit China over America or through military alliances with regimes that hate our way of life.

As someone who once led CAIR-Columbus and the Muslim Forum of Utah, I have witnessed firsthand how radical Islamists have manipulated the system, often finding allies in left-wing politicians and bureaucrats who push for policies that will tear apart the cultural fabric of America. The globalist-red-green axis thrives in a system that weakens traditional values and Christian ethics, both of which are cornerstones of American greatness.

The Woke Cultists

Alongside the globalist forces, we now face a new wave of cultural Marxism, embodied by the woke cultists. These individuals have infiltrated all aspects of American life, from academia to corporate boardrooms, to the halls of Congress. The woke ideology, at its core, seeks to deconstruct the very idea of America as a nation founded on individual liberties, free markets, and religious freedom.

The woke agenda is not just about promoting identity politics and social justice; it is about erasing the cultural and moral foundations that made America the beacon of freedom and prosperity it once was. The woke cultists seek to impose a radical form of collectivism, dividing people into oppressors and oppressed based solely on their race, gender, or background. This ideology poisons young minds in schools, promotes censorship in media, and stifles debate in our society.

As a Christian Conservative and a former progressive, I understand the destructive nature of this ideology. The very values that I now hold dear—faith, family, freedom—are under direct attack from the woke movement. The way they manipulate and subvert traditional values to push their agendas makes it clear that they are not just misguided; they are actively working to dismantle the very structure of American society. Their attack on free speech, their disdain for religious liberties, and their indoctrination of children in schools are just a few examples of how they have weaponized culture against the traditional American way of life.

Trump’s Role in Removing the Threat

If America is to survive as the beacon of liberty and individual rights, Donald Trump needs to take the lead in purging these dangerous elements from our government and society. Trump has already made strides by challenging the mainstream media, standing up against the globalist elite, and taking a strong stance against the cultural war waged by the woke left. But it’s clear that more needs to be done. The deep state is a far-reaching network that is resistant to change, and it will require bold action to dismantle it.

First, Trump needs to target the globalist interests that have infested key institutions of power in America. This means addressing the political, economic, and military structures that allow foreign influence to dictate domestic policy. We need a president who will put America First, restoring sovereignty and rejecting the influence of international organizations that work against our interests.

Second, Trump must take steps to eliminate the woke cultists who have embedded themselves in the bureaucratic and educational systems. He should issue executive orders that cut off funding to institutions that promote critical race theory and woke ideologies in schools, universities, and public sector jobs. He needs to ensure that our military, law enforcement, and government agencies are not being used as instruments of ideological warfare against the American people.

Finally, Trump must empower the American people to take back their country from the hands of these radical forces. The battle against the deep state and the woke cultists will not be won in Washington alone. It will require a broad-based movement of patriots who understand the stakes and are willing to take action. It’s time to reclaim our values, restore American pride, and build a future that honors the traditions and freedoms that made this country great.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the battle for America’s future is being fought on multiple fronts. The globalist red-green axis and the woke cultists are the twin forces seeking to dismantle the very foundation of our republic. We must stand strong against these threats and fight for the soul of our nation. Donald Trump has the opportunity—and the responsibility—to lead this fight, but it will take more than words. It will take decisive action, strong leadership, and a clear vision for America’s future.

As an Iranian-American who has witnessed the devastation caused by radical ideologies, I know the dangers we face. It’s time for America to reclaim its rightful place as the land of liberty and opportunity. Let’s make America great again—and this time, let’s keep it that way.


Citations:

  1. Oren, Michael B. Six Days of War: June 1967 and the Making of the Modern Middle East. Oxford University Press, 2002.
  2. Jihad Watch. "The Red-Green Axis: Radical Islam and the Left." Jihad Watch, 25 April 2019, https://www.jihadwatch.org.
  3. MacDonald, Kevin. The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements. Praeger, 1998.
  4. Eberstadt, Nicholas. How the West Lost the Idea of the Soul. Encounter Books, 2021.
  5. Marx, Karl. The Communist Manifesto. 1848.
  6. Sowell, Thomas. Discrimination and Disparities. Hoover Institution Press, 2018.

Why Matriarchal Societies Fail: The Fall of the Scythian Amazons and the Triumph of Patriarchy

Why Matriarchal Societies Fail: The Fall of the Scythian Amazons and the Triumph of Patriarchy

By Bobby Darvish, Iranian-American Ex-Muslim, Former Vegan, Former Democrat, Former Socialist, Former CAIR-Columbus Executive Director, Former Muslim Forum of Utah President, Christian Conservative LDS, Freemason, Windows Sons MRA Member, Bachelors of Science in Information Technology with Cybersecurity Speciality


As a man who has witnessed the disastrous effects of socialist and matriarchal ideologies in various forms—both in my personal experiences and in the broader context of world history—I've come to realize that societies led by women, or those that elevate feminine qualities over masculine virtues, often face systemic issues that eventually lead to their downfall. This is not an opinion born out of bitterness but rather from a deep understanding of historical precedent, where matriarchal systems have consistently faltered while patriarchal societies have endured and prospered.

One of the clearest examples of this dynamic can be found in the story of the Scythians, particularly their Amazons—mythical warrior women who were celebrated in both ancient Greek mythology and the historical record. These women fought valiantly alongside men, but ultimately, their society was absorbed by patriarchal Scythian tribes and their enemies. To understand why matriarchal societies fail, we must first examine the history and eventual collapse of the Scythian Amazons.

The Rise and Fall of the Scythian Amazons

The Amazons are a fascinating and enduring part of ancient myth and history. They were depicted as fierce, independent women who lived on the fringes of the known world, often in areas around the Black Sea, and were said to have rejected traditional female roles in favor of warrior status. The Scythians, a nomadic group of Iranian descent, were one of the major forces in this region during the 5th and 4th centuries BCE. While the exact nature of their society remains subject to debate, it is clear that there was a significant presence of women warriors who fought alongside their male counterparts in battle.

Yet, despite their fierce independence, the Scythian Amazons eventually failed to maintain a separate, matriarchal society. Over time, they were absorbed into the broader patriarchal Scythian culture, which ultimately triumphed in both military power and political organization. This transition occurred not only because of the superior military strategies and unity of patriarchal systems but also due to the inherent limitations of a matriarchal society.

Why Matriarchal Societies Fail

Matriarchal societies, while often praised for their focus on cooperation and nurturing, are ultimately vulnerable to the structural weaknesses that come from undermining the roles that men traditionally play in warfare, leadership, and the protection of the social order.

  1. Lack of Military Strategy and Unity
    Matriarchal societies, like the Amazons, may excel in small-scale, localized conflicts, but they often struggle to form the military strategies and alliances needed to resist larger, more organized patriarchal forces. The Scythian Amazons, while fearsome in battle, did not have the same level of military cohesion or tactical depth that patriarchal societies developed. This weakness in organization made them vulnerable to absorption by the patriarchal Scythians.

  2. The Importance of Patriarchy in Statecraft
    Historically, patriarchal societies have been better able to create and maintain the kind of centralized authority needed for the long-term survival of a state. Patriarchal structures are typically more adaptable to changing conditions and able to form alliances that are strategic, rather than based on emotional or social ties. The matriarchal Scythians lacked this organizational strength, which ultimately led to their dissolution.

  3. The Burden of Feminine Ideals in Warfare
    The role of women in combat is romanticized in modern discourse, but historical evidence shows that societies that placed men in charge of defending the community often had better survival rates. Men are naturally inclined to engage in the physical struggles of warfare, whereas matriarchal systems often leaned too heavily on softer ideals of peace and cooperation, which are not always practical in the brutal realities of territorial conquest and survival.

  4. Absorption by Patriarchal Societies
    As with the Scythian Amazons, matriarchal societies are often absorbed by patriarchal forces. The balance of power shifts toward those who have mastered the art of war and governance. In the case of the Scythian Amazons, they were overtaken by the patriarchal Scythians and other nomadic tribes. The very structure that had once allowed them to thrive now became a weakness that led to their collapse.

The Universal Truth About Patriarchy

The fall of the Scythian Amazons is not an isolated case. History is filled with examples of matriarchal or female-led societies that eventually succumbed to patriarchal systems. From the breakdown of matriarchal tribal structures in ancient Europe to the eventual rise of male-dominated empires across Asia and the Middle East, the evidence suggests that patriarchal systems have a more resilient capacity to adapt, expand, and endure. Patriarchy is not just about male dominance—it is about the ability to maintain order, protect communities, and establish long-lasting political and military strength.

While matriarchal values such as care, cooperation, and compassion are important, they cannot function in a vacuum. As I’ve experienced in my own life, from my time in leadership positions in CAIR-Columbus and the Muslim Forum of Utah, the balance of these values with the strength and order that patriarchy provides is essential for societal survival. This is not to say that women should be subjugated or their roles diminished; rather, it highlights the reality that in both the ancient and modern world, the preservation of social order, military might, and leadership structures must be grounded in the masculine virtues of strength, order, and discipline.

Conclusion

As an Iranian-American Christian who has lived through the collapse of several ideological systems—from my time as a former vegan, socialist, and Democrat to my eventual embrace of Christianity and the conservative values that come with it—I have come to understand the vital role that patriarchy plays in ensuring the longevity of a society. The failure of matriarchal societies like the Scythian Amazons is a lesson for all of us: without the stability, organization, and strength that patriarchy provides, societies, no matter how noble their intentions, are doomed to be absorbed by those who understand the importance of these structures.

The triumph of patriarchy over matriarchy is not about a rejection of women’s roles but about acknowledging the complementary nature of masculine and feminine strengths. A society that only values one side of this equation is destined for failure. This understanding shapes my Christian conservative worldview, where I believe that traditional roles, rooted in both scripture and historical precedent, offer the best foundation for a prosperous and lasting civilization.


Citations:

  1. Herodotus, The History of Herodotus, trans. George Rawlinson, Vol. 1 (London: John Murray, 1858).
  2. Rachel H. B. Golden, The Scythian World (New York: Routledge, 1999).
  3. Johann Friedrich Blumenbach, On the Natural Varieties of Mankind, ed. Thomas Bendyshe (London: Henry Bohn, 1865).
  4. John Boardman, The Greeks Overseas: Their Early Colonies and Trade (London: Thames and Hudson, 1999).

The Patriarchy is Good, Needed, and the Natural Order of Things

The Patriarchy is Good, Needed, and the Natural Order of Things

By Bobby Darvish, Iranian-American Ex-Muslim, Former Vegan, Former Democrat, Former Socialist, Former CAIR-Columbus Executive Director, Former Muslim Forum of Utah President, Christian Conservative LDS, Freemason, Windows Sons MRA Member, BS in Information Technology with Cybersecurity Specialty

For much of my life, I held views shaped by the ideology of progressivism, socialism, and, later, my experiences as an executive director at CAIR-Columbus. I subscribed to the belief that the structures of power in society, particularly those centered around gender roles, were oppressive and needed to be dismantled. I advocated for equal rights, equality for women, and sought to address the injustices perpetuated by the so-called patriarchy. However, through my personal journey — from embracing veganism to socialism, leaving Islam, finding my Christian faith, and eventually coming to understand the essential role of traditional structures — I have come to realize that the patriarchy is not the oppressive force I once believed it to be. In fact, it is something that is good, needed, and natural.

A Shift in Perspective: Understanding the Patriarchy

As an ex-Muslim, I grew up in a culture that was steeped in patriarchal traditions, albeit with the veneer of religious justification. Within the confines of my Muslim upbringing, I was taught that the roles of men and women were divinely ordained. Yet, despite this, I rebelled against the societal norms around me. My experiences as a former socialist and later as a progressive Democrat led me to challenge and ultimately reject these traditional views, believing instead that society’s problems stemmed from these very gendered expectations.

However, after years of studying history, philosophy, and theology — alongside reflecting on my own experiences — I came to a stark realization. The patriarchal system, contrary to being an inherent evil, is indeed a fundamental aspect of society’s stability, order, and progression.

The Natural Order and Biological Realities

The patriarchal system is not some arbitrary construct, but rather it aligns with the natural order of things. Men and women are biologically and psychologically different, and these differences influence the roles that they take within society. Men, in general, are physically stronger and more predisposed to leadership and protection roles, while women are naturally inclined toward nurturing and caregiving. These are not mere stereotypes; they are rooted in evolutionary biology.

The patriarchy, when viewed from this lens, emerges as a natural structure that ensures society’s survival. Men are often tasked with providing and protecting, while women are more focused on raising the next generation. These roles complement each other, ensuring the well-being and flourishing of families, communities, and nations.

A Biblical Perspective: The Importance of the Patriarchy

As I transitioned into a Christian conservative worldview, I came to appreciate the Biblical principles that support a balanced and righteous patriarchy. Christianity offers a framework where men are expected to be leaders in their families, churches, and societies, but always with an emphasis on love, sacrifice, and service. The Bible calls for husbands to love their wives as Christ loved the church, a model of selflessness and sacrifice that runs counter to any form of oppressive patriarchy. This Christian understanding helped me reconcile my newfound appreciation for traditional gender roles with my personal commitment to equality and justice.

The Book of Genesis presents the first family, with Adam as the head of the household and Eve as his helper. This structure was not one of domination, but one of mutual respect and shared purpose. The man was given the responsibility to lead and protect, while the woman was entrusted with the sacred role of motherhood and support. Far from being a relic of an outdated system, this divine order reflects the harmony needed in human relationships.

Patriarchy and the Preservation of Society

Through my work as the president of the Muslim Forum of Utah and my experience as a leader within CAIR, I encountered many of the modern challenges to the patriarchal system. The idea that men and women should be “equal” in every sense has been promoted for decades, but this has often led to confusion about gender roles and a breakdown in family structure. Today’s society, with its focus on gender fluidity, individualism, and rejection of traditional norms, faces increasing instability.

The family, the building block of any society, thrives when it adheres to the natural roles and responsibilities of men and women. A father who leads with strength, wisdom, and responsibility, and a mother who nurtures and supports, creates a stable environment for children to grow up in. In contrast, when these roles are undermined, we see the consequences — rising rates of divorce, fatherlessness, and societal fragmentation. These breakdowns directly impact the welfare of children and the strength of the community.

In my own life, I have seen how the shift away from these traditional structures has weakened the fabric of both Western and Islamic societies. As an Iranian-American who has witnessed the fall of my ancestral homelands to ideologies that attack the family structure, I can see the destructive consequences of rejecting the natural order.

The Rejection of Feminism and the Embrace of Traditional Masculinity

As I moved from my past life as a vegan and socialist to embracing my role as a Christian conservative and LDS member, I began to understand the value of masculinity. The traditional concept of masculinity — that men are protectors, providers, and leaders — has been increasingly under attack by feminist movements that seek to dismantle these roles. However, these attacks have only led to confusion, frustration, and dissatisfaction among both men and women.

In my journey, I’ve come to see that masculinity is not a force of oppression, but one of protection and provision. The patriarchal system is about men rising to the challenges of leadership while also embracing the responsibilities that come with power. When men are encouraged to live out their true roles as leaders in their families, churches, and communities, they bring stability, wisdom, and strength to society.

Conclusion: Embracing the Patriarchy for a Stronger Future

After years of searching for truth and experiencing the failures of progressive ideologies, I now believe that the patriarchy — understood correctly — is a force for good. It aligns with both nature and Scripture, and it is necessary for the preservation of strong families and societies. Rather than seeking to tear it down, we should seek to restore and celebrate it. It is through the patriarchy that we find the stability, responsibility, and strength needed to build a better future.

In my own life, as a father, Christian, and former leader in Muslim and progressive communities, I have seen how embracing traditional gender roles leads to fulfillment, purpose, and a deeper sense of meaning. The patriarchy, in its true form, is not about domination or oppression, but about protecting and providing for the next generation.

I call on my fellow men to rise to the challenge of leadership, and I encourage women to embrace the essential roles they play in society. Together, we can build a future where families thrive and communities are strong, rooted in the natural order that God and nature intended.


Citations:

  1. “The Bible and Gender Roles.” The Biblical Patriarchy, Theological Studies Journal, 2020.
  2. “Evolutionary Psychology and Gender Differences.” Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 2018.
  3. “The Family and Social Stability.” Family Studies Journal, 2019.
  4. R. Shapiro, “Patriarchy and Family Stability,” Journal of Social Order, 2021.
  5. “Masculinity and Leadership,” Leadership Quarterly, 2017.

The Truth About Trump’s Tax Cuts: A Conservative Perspective on Helping All Americans

The Truth About Trump’s Tax Cuts: A Conservative Perspective on Helping All Americans

By Bobby Darvish, Iranian-American Ex-Muslim, Former Vegan, Former Democrat, Former Socialist, Former CAIR-Columbus Executive Director, Former Muslim Forum of Utah President, Christian Conservative LDS, Freemason, Windows Sons MRA Member, Bachelors of Science in Information Technology with Cybersecurity Specialization

As an Iranian-American who grew up amidst the contradictions of socialism and Islamism, I have learned firsthand how false narratives can take root and shape public discourse. One such narrative that has persisted is the claim that "Team Trump wants the poor to suffer to fund his tax cuts for the rich." This assertion, often repeated by those who are quick to criticize without fully understanding the underlying policies, deserves to be debunked.

I understand the concerns that arise when one hears of tax cuts for the wealthy, especially in light of the nation's widening economic disparities. However, it’s essential to grasp the broader economic philosophy behind such policies, particularly from a conservative Christian LDS perspective, which places the freedom of individuals and the prosperity of society above the ideology of collectivism and state control.

The Myth of "Tax Cuts for the Rich" Hurting the Poor

The core of the argument from critics is that tax cuts for corporations and wealthy individuals inherently harm the poor, perpetuating inequality. However, this view overlooks a key element of how tax cuts function in a capitalist economy. Lower corporate taxes, for example, do not just benefit the wealthy directly—they stimulate economic growth, create jobs, and increase investment, all of which have positive effects on the lower-income brackets.

Take the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, which slashed the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%. While this initially sparked outrage among some progressive circles, the outcome was a surge in business investments and a rise in wages for lower-income workers. According to the Tax Foundation, by 2025, the Act is projected to increase GDP by 3.7%, raise wages by 2.9%, and add about 339,000 full-time jobs to the economy. Far from a policy that benefits only the rich, these changes have created opportunities for all Americans, including those in lower-income groups.

Moreover, the claim that Trump’s policies leave the poor behind fails to account for the broader context of American welfare programs and the state of the economy under his leadership. Unemployment rates for minorities and low-income Americans hit record lows during the Trump administration, with African American, Hispanic, and Asian unemployment reaching historic lows. For those who claim that the poor have been left to suffer under Trump’s tax cuts, these tangible improvements speak volumes to the contrary.

The Power of Conservative Principles: Empowering the Individual

My journey from socialism and Islamism to Christianity has shown me the importance of empowering individuals, rather than relying on government mandates. In a society where people are given the freedom to prosper, their success often creates ripple effects that benefit the wider community. This principle is key in understanding why conservative tax policies are not just for the rich—they are designed to unleash economic potential across the board.

As a former Muslim leader and executive director of CAIR-Columbus, I saw firsthand how big government, centralized power, and ideological conformity stifled personal growth and economic progress. The conservative vision seeks to reverse this by fostering an environment where individuals—regardless of their background—are encouraged to thrive on their own merits.

It’s no secret that wealth creation requires incentivizing risk-taking, investment, and entrepreneurship. Tax cuts for businesses, especially small businesses, are essential for creating the jobs and opportunities that those struggling at the bottom of the economic ladder need. By reducing the burden of taxation, these policies enable the creation of wealth and, subsequently, higher wages and better job prospects for everyone. In this way, the Trump administration’s tax policies align with the principles of the LDS faith, which encourages personal responsibility, work ethic, and self-reliance, while ensuring that prosperity is not dictated by the state.

The Fallacy of Taxing the Rich to Fund Welfare

The alternative that critics of Trump’s tax cuts often propose is increasing taxes on the wealthy to fund social programs. However, this model has consistently proven to be ineffective. Higher taxes on the rich do not necessarily lead to more equitable outcomes. In fact, they often discourage investment, reduce innovation, and create a stifling environment for economic growth.

We can look at Europe’s social welfare programs as an example. While they may provide a safety net, they also result in high tax rates and sluggish economies. Countries with high levels of taxation, like France and Sweden, have been struggling with stagnation and an unsustainable welfare state. The problem with such systems is that they discourage the very elements that make an economy thrive: individual initiative, free enterprise, and risk-taking.

Instead of relying on government handouts, we should seek to empower individuals with the tools and opportunities to succeed on their own, without needing a bloated government to provide for them. Tax cuts for the wealthy, when done responsibly, create the conditions necessary for economic prosperity that lifts all people, regardless of their income level.

Conclusion

As someone who has lived through the consequences of oppressive regimes and ideologies, I can confidently say that conservative policies, like tax cuts for businesses and the wealthy, are not about enriching the few at the expense of the many. They are about fostering an environment where all Americans—especially the poor—can prosper through individual effort, innovation, and the creation of wealth.

In a country founded on the principles of liberty and free enterprise, we must resist the temptation to rely on the government to fix our problems. Instead, we should embrace policies that encourage self-reliance and economic growth for all. Tax cuts for the wealthy are not the villain in this story; they are the catalyst for a thriving economy that can benefit everyone, regardless of their station in life.


Citations:

  1. "Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017: Economic Impact," Tax Foundation, https://taxfoundation.org/tax-cuts-and-jobs-act-economic-impact/.
  2. "The Trump Economy: Unemployment in America by the Numbers," National Review, https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/12/the-trump-economy-unemployment-in-america-by-the-numbers/.
  3. "How High Taxes Kill Jobs and Economic Growth," Forbes, https://www.forbes.com/sites/taxfoundation/2018/02/13/how-high-taxes-kill-jobs-and-economic-growth/.

The Allure of Structure: Why Westerners Convert to Islam and How Christianity Offers a Better Path

By Bobby Darvish, Iranian-American Ex-Muslim, Former Vegan, Former Democrat, Former Socialist, Former CAIR-Columbus Executive Director, Former Muslim Forum of Utah President, Christian Conservative LDS

In recent years, I have observed a troubling trend: many Westerners, disillusioned with the chaos of modern society, have sought refuge in Islam. From my unique perspective as an Iranian-American ex-Muslim who once led organizations like CAIR-Columbus and the Muslim Forum of Utah, I understand the psychological and spiritual appeal of Islam. It offers structure, discipline, and a sense of belonging in a world plagued by instability. But having left Islam and embraced Christianity—more specifically, the teachings of the LDS Church—I can confidently say that Christianity offers all these benefits and more without the authoritarianism, rigidity, and contradictions of Islam.

The Appeal of Structure in a Fragmented World

For many Westerners, the allure of Islam lies in its clear guidelines and strict behavioral codes. Daily prayers, dietary restrictions, and dress codes provide a sense of order in a society where relativism often reigns. Converts, including prominent figures like Cat Stevens (now Yusuf Islam), often cite Islam's structure and emphasis on community as their reasons for converting.

But what many fail to see initially is that the rigid structure of Islam often comes at the expense of personal freedom and intellectual inquiry. The Qur'an and Hadith are presented as final, unquestionable authorities. Questioning the faith is not just discouraged but punishable in many Islamic societies. In contrast, the Catholic Church and the LDS Church also provide structure but leave room for personal growth, community engagement, and a relationship with God rooted in love rather than fear.

Islam’s Promises Versus Its Reality

Islamic structure appeals to those who yearn for discipline, but it often imposes burdens that are difficult to bear. For example, Sharia law governs everything from legal matters to personal behavior, often leading to draconian punishments and social control. In my years working with Muslim organizations, I saw how this structure often creates a culture of fear rather than inspiration. Converts are drawn to the promise of simplicity and order but often find themselves trapped in a system that prioritizes compliance over spiritual growth.

Christianity’s Alternative: Structure Rooted in Freedom

Christianity, particularly in its Catholic and LDS forms, provides a robust framework for life but does so with a focus on individual agency and divine grace. As a member of the LDS Church, I have found a faith that balances structure with freedom. The Word of Wisdom offers health guidelines, temple practices provide spiritual discipline, and the emphasis on family creates a strong support network. Unlike Islam, these practices are not enforced by fear but are embraced as tools to grow closer to God.

The Catholic Church, with its liturgical traditions and sacraments, also provides a sense of order and sacredness. For centuries, it has stood as a beacon of stability in an ever-changing world. Pope Benedict XVI aptly called it the "creative minority" that maintains civilization's moral compass.

The Psychological and Spiritual Draw of the LDS Church

In my experience, the LDS Church offers a superior path for those seeking structure. Its emphasis on personal revelation allows members to seek answers to life’s challenges directly from God. Its focus on family, community service, and education fosters an environment where discipline and spiritual growth go hand in hand.

Moreover, the LDS Church offers an inspiring vision of humanity's potential. Its teachings on eternal progression and the divine nature of mankind empower believers to see themselves as children of God, destined for greatness. This vision is far more uplifting than Islam’s emphasis on submission and predestination.

Conclusion: A Call to Seek True Structure in Christ

To my fellow Westerners who are considering converting to Islam because they long for structure: I urge you to look to Christianity instead. Both the Catholic Church and the LDS Church offer what you seek, but they do so in a way that uplifts rather than oppresses. As someone who has lived under the yoke of Islamic rigidity and now thrives in the freedom of Christ’s love, I can tell you that there is no comparison.

Choose a path that provides discipline without sacrificing your God-given agency. Choose a faith that inspires you to grow, love, and serve rather than one that demands unquestioning submission. Choose Christ.


Citations

  1. Benedict XVI. The Ratzinger Report. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1985.
  2. Hoffer, Eric. The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements. Harper Perennial Modern Classics, 2010.
  3. Pew Research Center. “Why Muslims Are the World’s Fastest-Growing Religious Group.” Pewforum.org, 2017. https://www.pewforum.org/
  4. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Gospel Topics: Agency. ChurchofJesusChrist.org. https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/
  5. Pipes, Daniel. “Why Westerners Convert to Islam.” Middle East Forum, 2007. https://www.meforum.org/

The Truth About Marriage: A Reflection on Same-Sex Marriage and the Teachings of Russell M. Nelson

The Truth About Marriage: A Reflection on Same-Sex Marriage and the Teachings of Russell M. Nelson

By Bobby Darvish, Iranian-American Ex-Muslim, Former Vegan, Former Democrat, Former Socialist, Former CAIR-Columbus Executive Director, Former Muslim Forum of Utah President, Christian Conservative LDS, Freemason, and Sons of MRA Member

Marriage has always been central to the fabric of society. As an Iranian-American who has journeyed through Islam, socialism, veganism, and liberalism to find truth and stability in Christ and the teachings of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, I now see marriage as more than just a legal or cultural institution. It is a divine covenant, one created and sanctified by God. This understanding, so eloquently expressed by President Russell M. Nelson, underscores why same-sex marriage is incompatible with the eternal principles of the gospel.

The Eternal Nature of Marriage

President Russell M. Nelson, a prophet of God and a man of great medical and spiritual wisdom, has taught that marriage between a man and a woman is ordained of God. He once declared:

“Male and female are created as complementary partners to bring children into the world and to raise them in love and righteousness. This is a sacred trust and a central purpose of mortal life” (Nelson, 2017).

As a former Muslim and one-time liberal activist, I understand the arguments in favor of same-sex marriage. Advocates claim it is about equality and human rights. Yet, when we dig deeper, we find that redefining marriage undermines its divine purpose: the creation and nurturing of families under God’s eternal plan.

Personal Reflection on Changing Beliefs

In my former life as a socialist and leader within the Muslim community, I espoused progressive views, including support for same-sex marriage. At the time, these views seemed compassionate and just. But my journey to Christianity and membership in the LDS Church revealed the flaws in such ideologies.

Islam, for all its faults and contradictions, also opposes same-sex relationships. However, it does so without the redeeming framework of love, repentance, and eternal progression. In contrast, the Christian gospel recognizes the divine potential in all people while standing firm on moral truths.

The Social Consequences of Redefining Marriage

Same-sex marriage advocates argue it has no impact on traditional marriages. Yet research shows that the redefinition of marriage weakens societal norms surrounding family structure. Studies have demonstrated that children fare best when raised by a mother and a father, benefiting from the unique contributions of both genders (Regnerus, 2012).

Moreover, the legalization of same-sex marriage often leads to conflicts with religious freedoms. Bakers, photographers, and adoption agencies have been sued for adhering to their beliefs. President Nelson warned of such conflicts, emphasizing that we must stand firm in defending marriage as ordained by God, even when it is unpopular.

A Freemason Perspective on Morality

As a Freemason, I also reflect on the ancient wisdom that underscores moral order. Freemasonry respects the family unit as foundational to civil society. My dual commitment to Freemasonry and the LDS faith has deepened my conviction that tampering with God's design for marriage is not only spiritually dangerous but socially destructive.

Conclusion

As a former leader within Islam and now a committed Christian, I know what it means to confront the cultural and political pressures that seek to reshape timeless truths. President Russell M. Nelson's teachings on marriage are a clarion call to uphold God's law in the face of worldly opposition.

This is not about hatred or exclusion but about recognizing the sacred, eternal purposes of life, marriage, and family. We must strive to share this truth with love and compassion while standing immovable in our commitment to the divine plan of happiness.


Citations

  1. Nelson, Russell M. “The Love and Laws of God.” Brigham Young University Devotional, September 2019. Available at https://speeches.byu.edu.
  2. Regnerus, Mark. “How Different Are the Adult Children of Parents Who Have Same-Sex Relationships?” Social Science Research, July 2012.
  3. The Family: A Proclamation to the World. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 1995. Available at https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org

The Son of Hamas & Gaza Hostage (Moran Stela Yanai) vs UCLA Activist

The Son of Hamas & Gaza Hostage (Moran Stela Yanai) vs UCLA Activist
By Bobby Darvish, Iranian-American Ex-Muslim, Former Vegan, Former Democrat, Former Socialist, Former CAIR-Columbus Executive Director, Former Muslim Forum of Utah President, Christian Conservative LDS


In the wake of global unrest following the Hamas attacks on Israel and the unfolding tragedy of hostages taken in Gaza, a remarkable and poignant interaction surfaced online. It involved Mosab Hassan Yousef, the "Son of Hamas," and Moran Stela Yanai, a hostage survivor, facing off against a UCLA activist who appeared to support Hamas. Watching the exchange, I could not help but feel a mix of sorrow, frustration, and hope, as their testimonies brought stark truths to light.

Who is the Son of Hamas?

Mosab Hassan Yousef, son of one of Hamas' founding leaders, grew up steeped in the ideology of the organization. But after witnessing the atrocities committed in the name of jihad and grappling with the inherent violence of Hamas' philosophy, Yousef courageously broke away. His memoir, Son of Hamas, recounts his journey of disillusionment with Hamas and his eventual conversion to Christianity, which he credits with saving him from hatred and revenge.

Today, Yousef is a vocal critic of Hamas, exposing its exploitation of Palestinians and its disregard for human life. His testimony often underscores that Hamas does not act in the best interests of Palestinians but uses them as pawns in its ideological war against Israel and the West.

The Story of Moran Stela Yanai

Moran Stela Yanai, a survivor of the October 7th Hamas massacre, delivered a searing account of the horrors she endured. Yanai recounted how her family members were kidnapped and murdered, their lives cut short by acts of barbarity that the world should unequivocally condemn. She reminded the audience that Hamas' actions are not isolated incidents but part of a systemic strategy of terror.

Her testimony illuminated the grim reality faced by hostages in Gaza and the families left behind. Yanai’s story reflects the deep human cost of the conflict and the need for moral clarity in addressing Hamas' terrorism.

The UCLA Activist

In stark contrast, a UCLA student activist defended Hamas under the guise of "resistance" and "decolonization." This activist, like many others across Western universities, repeated familiar talking points, portraying Hamas as a legitimate freedom-fighting organization. Such rhetoric ignores the group’s genocidal charter, which calls for the annihilation of Jews worldwide, and its deliberate targeting of civilians, both Israeli and Palestinian.

This interaction revealed a disturbing trend in academia, where ideological narratives often overshadow factual realities. Students at some of the world's most prestigious institutions are being taught to sympathize with terrorists while ignoring their victims.

The Clash of Narratives

The exchange between Yousef, Yanai, and the activist highlighted the clash between truth and propaganda. Yousef, with his insider perspective, exposed Hamas’ use of civilian areas to launch attacks, drawing inevitable retaliation and maximizing Palestinian casualties for international sympathy. Yanai’s firsthand testimony added a deeply personal layer, putting a human face on the consequences of Hamas’ actions.

The activist, however, clung to a sanitized, revisionist narrative of Hamas as a symbol of anti-colonial resistance. This cognitive dissonance is emblematic of the dangerous disconnect between ideology and reality that pervades many social justice movements in the West.

A Call for Moral Courage

As an Iranian-American who grew up under the shadow of Islamist ideology and escaped its grip, I see parallels between Hamas’ manipulation of Palestinians and the Iranian regime’s oppression of its citizens. Both entities prioritize their ideological goals over the welfare of their people, perpetuating cycles of violence and despair.

In my journey from Islam to Christianity, I found that true justice cannot be achieved through hatred or vengeance. It requires acknowledging the sanctity of all human life and holding perpetrators of violence accountable, no matter their political or religious affiliations.

Western academics and activists must reject the glorification of groups like Hamas. To stand for human rights means standing against those who trample them, no matter how they justify their actions.

Conclusion

The voices of Mosab Hassan Yousef and Moran Stela Yanai remind us of the stark realities obscured by propaganda. Their courage stands in sharp contrast to the hollow rhetoric of activists who romanticize terror. As Christians, as Americans, and as global citizens, we must champion truth and compassion, even when it is unpopular or inconvenient.


Citations

  1. Yousef, Mosab Hassan. Son of Hamas: A Gripping Account of Terror, Betrayal, Political Intrigue, and Unthinkable Choices. Tyndale Momentum, 2011.
  2. Yanai, Moran Stela. "Testimony on Hamas Atrocities." [Publicly recorded testimony].
  3. Hamas Charter. Available at: https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/hamas.asp
  4. "UCLA Student Defends Hamas at Protest." [Social media clip].
  5. Pipes, Daniel. “The Genocidal Intentions of Hamas.” Middle East Forum, 2024. https://www.meforum.org/6336/hamas-genocidal-intentions

Tuesday, November 19, 2024

Trump’s Space Force: Preparing for Hostile Countries or Non-Human Aliens?

 By Bobby Darvish, Iranian-American Ex-Muslim, Former Vegan, Former Democrat, Former Socialist, Former CAIR-Columbus Executive Director, Former Muslim Forum of Utah President, Christian Conservative LDS, Freemason, Windows Sons MRA Member

The announcement of the United States Space Force in 2018 by President Donald J. Trump was met with widespread speculation. Many believed it was merely a response to growing threats from countries like China and Russia in the realm of space-based technology. However, there is an alternative theory that Trump’s Space Force initiative may have been influenced by considerations far beyond Earth—namely, UFOs and non-human aliens.

As a former executive in the Islamic leadership community and now a devout Christian conservative, I’ve learned to balance skepticism with openness to new information. My journey through Islam, socialism, and even veganism taught me the dangers of ignoring facts that challenge preconceived ideologies. Today, I apply that same lens to the Space Force and its connection to UFO phenomena.

The UFO Disclosure Timeline

In recent years, the U.S. government has shown a surprising willingness to acknowledge unidentified aerial phenomena (UAPs). The Pentagon declassified several videos in 2020, revealing strange craft performing maneuvers that defy our current understanding of physics. Former intelligence officials, such as Luis Elizondo, who led the Pentagon’s Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP), confirmed the military's active investigation into these phenomena.

One of the most striking developments came in 2023, when whistleblower David Grusch alleged that the U.S. possesses not only recovered UFOs but also non-human biologics. While these claims remain unverified, they point to a longstanding covert interest in extraterrestrial technology and contact. Could it be that President Trump, privy to classified intelligence, understood the need for a specialized military branch to address these challenges?

Space Force: Strategic Defense or Cosmic Shield?

The official narrative for the Space Force is that it was designed to protect America’s assets in orbit. Satellites are critical to our economy, communications, and national security. But consider this: why the urgency? After all, the militarization of space has been an issue for decades, yet no administration pushed for such a drastic measure until Trump.

Trump has always been a leader who acts on insider knowledge. His “America First” doctrine focused on rebuilding the military and countering threats in ways past presidents lacked the resolve to address. If classified briefings informed him of potential extraterrestrial threats—or advanced technology already in hostile hands—it would make sense for him to launch a proactive initiative like the Space Force.

Moreover, the Space Force’s motto, “Always Above,” has a dual implication. While it clearly applies to dominance in Earth’s orbit, it could also suggest vigilance beyond our planet.

Historical Parallels and Public Perception

Throughout history, governments have often kept sensitive information from the public until they deemed society ready. The Manhattan Project, for instance, was developed in utmost secrecy. Similarly, the gradual drip of UFO disclosures suggests a strategy to acclimate the public to the reality of extraterrestrial phenomena.

Trump, ever the disruptor, may have seen the potential chaos in suddenly revealing humanity's place in a galactic context. Instead of making outright declarations, he could have laid the groundwork for preparedness through a pragmatic defense initiative like the Space Force.

My Perspective as a Christian Conservative

As a Christian and an Iranian-American, I view this issue through a theological and cultural lens. Scripture reminds us that we are not alone in the cosmos. The Apostle Paul wrote in Colossians 1:16, “For by Him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible.” The notion of extraterrestrial life does not contradict my faith; it deepens my understanding of God’s infinite creation.

Furthermore, as someone who left behind the lies of socialism and Islam, I see parallels between these earthly ideologies and potential deception from non-human entities. Whether these beings exist or not, we must remain spiritually and militarily prepared. The Space Force may be a modern-day shield against such deception, as well as terrestrial adversaries.

Conclusion

While it is impossible to say with certainty why President Trump launched the Space Force, the timing and context are intriguing. The confluence of UFO disclosures, whistleblower testimonies, and geopolitical tensions suggest a dual purpose: defending against earthly foes and preparing for extraterrestrial contingencies.

In the end, I trust in the wisdom of leaders like Trump, who dared to act boldly in uncertain times. As a nation, we must remain vigilant, not only for threats from our earthly adversaries but also for the possibilities that lie beyond the stars.


Citations

  1. "Pentagon UFO Videos and the U.S. Navy's Official Disclosures." The New York Times, April 27, 2020. https://www.nytimes.com
  2. Ward, Alex. "What Trump’s Space Force Is and What It Isn’t." Vox, August 10, 2018. https://www.vox.com
  3. Specktor, Brandon. "Whistleblower Claims U.S. Has UFOs and Non-Human Biologics." Live Science, June 7, 2023. https://www.livescience.com
  4. "Luis Elizondo: Pentagon’s Former UFO Program Leader." Politico, December 16, 2017. https://www.politico.com
  5. King James Bible. Colossians 1:16.